Search results

A "civil law" which talks about serving "gods"? Yes, that's exactly the same...only different.

Joshua 24:15 Calvinists are impossible.

"...choose ye this day whom ye will serve..." Joshua 24:15 The master we select determines to which that master will direct, whether God's "path of the just" or Satan's perpetual sleep in the dust. Jeremiah 51:39 Jeremiah 51:57

Your inability to discern the plain texts of Scripture which prove the God-given gift of free will choice to humanity is worse than boring - its sweeping many toward a Christ-less grave by convincing them to absolve themselves of their responsibility to choose Christ and turn from sin. So, I'm...

The truth is that the Bible doesn't say what Paul told the Thess., so the only evidence we have to go on is historic evidence. Josephus, who wasn't even an ECF, is many times referred to for support of Biblical positions - are you saying we should now disregard what he has to say, or do you...

You obviously understand very little about the way things work. A change in the Constitution which prohibits more than two consecutive terms requires a 2/3 majority STATES (not Congressional) vote. What part of "...shall not be infringed" do you not get? Right now, some states are now declaring...

Yes, you present Biblical philosophy, I present it, everyone presents it. Look up the word. Not trying to sound intelligent, just trying to expose your philosophy as comparable to Luciferian religion in the hopes that you might begin to question why two things that should not sound anything...

"Whosoever', my favorite word in all of Scripture

There's no way you can "play on me" the "same asinine argument" that I make against Calvinism -- that reason being that ours is a religion of inclusivity, while the "exclusivity religion" of Calvinists is not that much different than Lucifer's. Both of you claim certain men are drawn to the...

# 584

I've never said they did. I've known for years that Darby did that, but the two ideas have so successfully merged that it's almost pointless to bring it up.

about 3 posts back

Up till now, I've not thought of you as a lazy schoolar, but you've obviously not read my post because there's not a single thing from EGW in it.

I'd like commentary on that list, please?

Says who? Are you limiting the power of God to speak to the spiritual dead who are yet living when He spoke to Lazarus who had ceased to exist altogether in the grave?

Your answer isn't clear to me. How does it relate to that list?

That's kinda silly. Spiritually dead folks exchange gifts every year at Christmas. Even my atheist friend gives presents to his family.

Are you saying there's the: spiritually dead dead guy spiritually alive dead guy spiritually alive alive guy Because Scripture only recognizes 1 and 3

Praise God somebody agrees with me :) No greater insult than for any of us to deny His right to rule over us which right is His by BOTH creation AND redemption.

Ultimately, yes, but that defense didn't work too well at the Nuremberg trials.