Search results

Amen to that!

Hi BG! Romans 6:14-16 answers that succinctly, but if anyone is still in doubt, we should probalby err on the side of caution...which come to think of it woulda saved me a TON of trouble in my younger days. LOL

Interesting, though I'm satisfied with just two resurrections. I think a "better" resurrection refers to more jewels in our crown.

When you say "gaseous" you remind me of another leftist who's been in the news lately telling us that if we don't listen to her and do something about all those gaseous cows, the world will end in 12 years.

The pope formerly recognized the Jesuit Order as the "military arm" of the papacy. Hitler said he patterned his SS after Jesuit methods/practices. The pope's confessor is only the Jesuit General aka "the Black Pope". The Jesuits are renown for their activities in governments, politics...

Wow, I've never met a descendant of the Huguenots! They of old would tell you that Futurism came straight out of Rome. No record of anyone teaching Futurism before the 16th century. To be clear, Historicism doesn't actually teach "the pope is the Antichrist"; it says "the office of the papacy...

I'd like to discuss specifics. Can you tell me which example of failed prophecy you're talking about?

Actually, I never said He didn't punish sinners. I said His hatred which causes Him to despise is directed at sin, but His hatred which causes Him to "prefer less" is directed at the sinner. No, but by comparing Scripture with Scripture, the picture that emerges is that God loves the sinner but...

But as soon as the 60's faded, American pride reemerged and by the end of the 80s we were proud victors of the Cold War - when I got back from the Gulf in '93, there were thousands and thousands in Mayport waiting for us when we pulled into port and disembarked. It was really awesome.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't you say that both OT and NT evidence must exist for a thing to be established?

There's nothing in Revelation 13 which demands the papacy must now in 2019 have already attained to the point at which "all the world wondered after the beast". As I said, the papacy received a deadly wound in 1798 when it was dissolved and the wound began healing in 1929 when the papal states...

The idea that a saint can take to himself credit, glory, honor, bragging rights, etc., for his own salvation which for himself he is helpless to provide but which he takes hold of by faith salvation which Jesus freely provides... ...is as illogical a notion as a drowning man having absolutely...

I think you're confusing "theft" with "gift of God to those who accept it".

Dave, you need a deeper understanding of the character of God and the justice with which He deals with sin and sinners. There are too many inconsistencies with your arguments: God is love but God hates people. God in the past paid the penalty of sin of those He will force to pay themselves...

That's ridiculous. No justice system in the world requires double payment for the same penalty. If God paid the penalty, then there's nothing left to pay. God died for everyone in the hope we all would accept that payment and be spared having to pay it ourselves in the Lake of Fire.

According to you, salvation was only available after circa 1500 B.C.

God hates sinners but sent His Son to die for a world of them? I guess that means He did it for vanity?

Call it whatever, you're still arguing limitations, so my question to you is where does that limitation leave everyone for the 2,500 years of Earth's history before the first Jew was around?

God hates sin but loves this world of sinners which is why He gave Jesus for it. Therefore, God prefers the righteous and prefers less the sinner.

What about Abraham? He wasn't Jewish.