Search results

I have the testimony of Scripture to support that the "prince" that shall come is "Messiah the Prince" because the Messiah is referenced THREE times in verses 25 and 26, with absolutely no mention of Antichrist. I also have the testimony of ancient history which testifies that "Prince Titus"...

The fact is that there are only TWO ways of looking at "the people of the prince that shall come" to destroy Jerusalem in 70 A.D. - "Messiah the Prince", Whose people destroyed themselves through driving away God's hand of protection...or..."prince Titus" of pagan Rome, whose army destroyed...

Amen, it is the probationary period given Israel to get their act together and announce the arrival of the Messiah, but they not only failed to do so, but had Him executed. I agree they have been fulfilled as well, and each of the six objectives of verse 24 can be shown as such - "...to anoint...

Where does it say "on Earth"? "Everlasting righteousness and peace to His people through His blood" can just as easily be the case. You talk about "everlasting peace and righteousness on Earth" and I'll show you condemned Christians so at peace in the righteousness of Christ that they lifted up...

"If ye be Christ's (CHRISTIANS), then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise." It is impossible to correctly understand who New Testament Israel is - and who New Testament Gentiles are - if we insist on ignoring that Old Testament Israel is no longer favored by God as "His...

You cannot point to a single other numerically specific time prophecy in Scripture which inserts a "gap" nor can you explain how a "70 Weeks" prophecy can still be referred to as "70 Weeks" when you claim that a "2,000 year gap" has been inserted. I challenge you to go to work and tell your...

What do you mean "the Philistines were no such kingdom to be considered a head"? They stole the Ark of the Covenant, constantly raided and harassed Israel, and are considered among "the most dangerous enemies of ancient Israel" by Israeli Deutoronomist sources...not to mention they served Dagon...

I used to think that way too...that is until someone dropped these two 10 Megaton truth bombs: 1) WHAT ABOUT THE PHILISTINES? Didn't they conquer and rule over Israel for a time, as well? The unwelcome fact is that your criteria for including Egypt and Assyria also applies to the Philistines...

They got it right The Antichrist had to have arisen among the Ten Horns of the fallen Roman Empire...that was all the way back in the 6th century, a fact that Jesuit "Left Behind" Futurists seem to willfully ignore. Of course there is separation. The Israelites had 70 Weeks to get their act...

***Straw man alert*** No one believes Antichrist is "born again". What is to be believed is that the papacy arose within the church and by false doctrine wrought a great apostasy which Paul predicted in 2 Thessalonians 2:3. The Bible speaks: 1 John 2:19 "They (Antichrist) went out from us..."...

There's nothing in Revelation to indicate that we should do anything else but start with Babylon as the first head. Since the "Little Horn" papacy which came up among the Ten Horns in 538 A.D. is still running it's mouth at the time of the final Judgment (Daniel 7:9-11), we should expect to find...

Dead Bread, as one who sincerely believes that when a pedophile priest says the Latin equivalent of "hocus pocus", a dead bread wafer and alcoholic booze turns into the "literal body and blood of Christ" - you are hardly in any position to criticize another's ability to appraise what is literal...

Two things: 1. What was the question? 2. It's called "commentary" which is perfectly acceptable practice as long as it agrees with Scripture.

***ATTENTION*** There are some promoting the false idea that the Mark of the Beast is a "chip" and that those who receive it in the hand or forehead get booked for a one way trip to the Lake of Fire. While it can be shown from the Bible that this is nonsense, you may stubbornly choose to accept...

I lose nothing by rejecting your ideas. You ignore well established eschatological principles to arrive at your conclusions: I. "Prophecy Begins In Day Of Prophet/Traces Down To End Of Time" The visions of Daniel and John always begin in the present - Babylon/Medo Persia for Daniel and Rome...

God says, "Come out of her ("Mystery Babylon the Great, the Mother of harlots": the catholic church) MY PEOPLE..." This means God has His people in "Babylon", but He is calling them out of her. I do not presume to judge the ratio of saints:sinners in Babylon, but I woud presume it to be low...

By papists' logic, Matthew 13:39, John 1:29, and Judges 9:8 means that at the end of the world angels will come with celestial Weed-eaters to kill the crabgrass, Jesus was a quadruped, wool-bearing mammal, and at one time trees appointed delegate members to the DNC - the Dogwood National...

Your interpretation excludes the prophetic time line of Daniel's prophecies. ANY FIRST CENTURY JEWISH CHRISTIAN CONVERT upon reading John's Revelation would have immediately begun turning the pages of his Bible to the book of Daniel to read about the four beasts in his book that were just laid...

Then who is the first beast? Please spare me the link and just say it so we can examine it in light of Scripture.

This is a total distortion of the Bible and your entire theory completely crumbles here: The "Beast" to which the Mark pertains is NOT the Second Beast, it is the FIRST Beast. The Second Beast merely enforces the Mark of the (first) Beast. You still haven't told us who the First Beast is, the...