Search results

But we can know if we follow the prophetic timeline, which identifies a succession of kingdoms with each successive one following on the heels of the previous one. Daniel 2 establishes Babylon as the starting point of that timeline, followed by Medo-Persian, Greece, Rome, the Ten Barbarian...

Why should the Bible have to prove your negative when it POSITIVELY identifies "beast" with "kingdom" several times?

It is precisely what the Bible calls Antichrist. It cannot be a single individual because: it was predicted to rise among the ten barbarian nations which arose out of pagan Rome it was to continue from that time - 6th century A.D. - all the way to the return of Christ. It is IMPOSSIBLE for...

Excellent brother. To the vast majority of professing Christians who practice the "saccharin sentimentalism" of vain religious lip service and made up commandments of men, God's law is a despised, burdensome list of "thou shalt nots..." ...but, to those who actually love Jesus, they are a...

So, the Bible says the EXACT SAME THING about God's Law as it says about God's character, and somehow you conclude that the one is good while the other is bad? This kind of thinking is EXACTLY why so many people will wake up a thousand years too late, stand before the Great White Throne in the...

MJRHEALTH I posted a comment about how Macron can't be the A/C. For one, when Daniel the prophet spoke about the "ten horns" or "ten barbarian nations" which arose out of the ashes of the fallen fourth beast - pagan Roman empire - he said "there came up among them ("the horns") another Little...

We should expect the devil to muddy the waters to prevent the truth from being seen clearly. That's why Jesus said the most important concern for us all was to "let no man deceive you by any means." There's only 3 schools of thought that are presented here: Protestant Historicism, Jesuit...

Pretty sure you're information is incorrect, just like everything else you say

The Roman catholic papacy arose right as prophecy predicted, among the "ten horns" which arose immediately after dust of the fallen fourth beast of Daniel 7 settled - Pagan Rome. "Papal Rome" came up among the "ten horns" which were the ten barbarian tribes which stood after the dust settled of...

The statements in question are not that of a Protestant minister...they are those of a papist.

No, because Macron didn't rise up among the ten horns of Daniel 7 which were the 10 barbarian tribes which divided up the fallen Western Roman Empire...like the papacy did.

We have listed tons of papal sources with the imprimatur stamped on them to show you how out of line with Scripture papists are, yet you refuse to accept such sources.

The Protestant Reformers understood the Antichrist to be the "office of the papacy", the leadership over the abominable amalgamation of the Catholic church and the Secular State. It is this system that claims to "take the place of Christ" on Earth for all humans - which is what the word...

The ten toes of Daniel are the ten barbarian divisions of the fourth beast which was predicted to be divided. The "little horn" is the papacy which arose among the ten and uprooted three: the Vandals Heruli Ostrogoths ...because these three refused to recognize the sovereign authority of the...

Long but necessary answer: Paul did identify the Pagan Roman Empire as the identity of the Restrainer which was preventing the rise of the "Man of Sin" in his visit to the Thessalonians, but in his 2 Thessalonians 2 letter he spoke about what he'd previously said in person plainly now in letter...

Core, what you believe the world never heard of until the Jesuits manufactured it. YOU STILL HAVE YET TO FIND JUST ONE ECF WHOSE INTERPRETATIONS MATCH YOURS.

Can't by, because Isaiah 13 plainly says Babylon will be as when God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah, saying "it shall never be rebuilt, nor dwelt..." Saddam H tried to rebuild Babylon. His hero was Nebuchanezzer, who threw the three Hebrew Worthies into the fiery furnace. Had a painting of...

Everyone knows that the "Antichrist" is aka "Man of Sin" aka "Son of Perdition aka "Little Horn of Daniel" aka "First Beast of Revelation 13" aka "The Whore riding a Beast of Revelation 17", etc. Just ask the Great Protestant Reformers if you don't believe me and they'll tell you why they taught...

The temple was destroyed, the city was burnt, there were thousands of crucifixes set up outside the city and dead Jew corpses inside the city, and the rest of the survivors were carried off to be enslaved or thrown to the lions in Rome...but Jerusalem wasn't destroyed. Got it.

The city of Revelation 11:8 is NOT Jerusalem for these reasons: 1. Jesus wasn't crucified "in the streets of the city" of Jerusalem. Everyone knows that was outside the city, on Golgotha. 2. Jesus is crucified wherever Christianity is crucified at large, for what is done to the least is done...