Search results

Miller was never an SDA! He misinterpreted the prophecy of Daniel 8, as did many others of his time. But, by the time the SDA church officially organized 20 years later, our doctrines were firmly in place and are still to this day as rock solid as ever. Just think of all the Biblical confusion...

Well, of course Lucifer and Satan are one in the same. Jesus Himself said in Luke 10 that He saw Satan fall from heaven and Isaiah 14 said it was Lucifer that fell from heaven. Also, because of the foundational principle in occult science which says light cannot exist w/o darkness, black w/o...

So, a likely French Catholic sympathizer claims that the quote is Reformation propaganda? Given that the Catholic church has been shepherded by the most disgusting revisionist historians and liars (as recently evidenced by the exposure of a filthy, systematic cover up of predator priests at the...

A warning with no consequences for our failure to heed it is an unnecessary warning, is it not?

Yes, I had second thoughts and decided that it would be pointless to continue the debate. No, I'm not suggesting you are Luciferian, friend. Just reminding you that Satan loves to invest in God the same deviant motives and reasoning of himself.

It's perfectly acceptable to hate error, because error causes those God loves to be lost and He wants them to be saved very much. That's why I hate the errors of Catholicism - the Antichrist of prophecy - because its empty rituals and dogmas serve as a means for remembering God for those who...

I see that you will not be convinced by Scripture or Biblical reasoning, so I'll leave you with this: Did you know the main appeal of occultism is that of "privileged inclusivity" to the detriment of "undeserving exclusivity"? Lucifer appears to the selfish and self centered, performs a few...

OK, "everlasting fire" it is. I have the weight of Scriptural evidence that the fire is prepared for the devil and his angels ALONE because that's exactly what Jesus said. It is you who are inferring that that fire is prepared for "us" in addition to the devil and his angels because Jesus...

You said that my post # 685 was "not true". Exactly which part is not true? If you hover your mouse pointer over the verse I wrote, you'll see that my post is 100% correct.

So, does this mean that Papal rites and teachings are completely in line with the Bible?

Rule #1: Faith in Jesus and His Word ALONE is sufficient to make one wise unto salvation. It says so in 2 Timothy 3:15 KJV. We don't need submission to the authority of the Pope, the intercession of priests, Mary, or dead Christians, nor the sacraments including the Eucharist, or anything else...

You are having trouble following me, so I'll make this plain and simply: The point I'm trying to make has nothing to do with who will end up in the Lake of Fire - of course plenty of humans will end up there - my point is concerning just who the LOF was prepared for, OK? Now, you claim God...

I think you meant to say that you don't care for my hatred for what the RCC teaches, because I've made it painfully clear to you that I do not hate anyone. When you're ready to accept that, I'll continue speaking to you.

Friend, Jesus Himself said the Lake of Fire is prepared for "the devil and his angels." If your interpretation is correct, then Jesus was wrong because He failed to say that it was prepared "for the devil, his angels, and those whom God deliberately created to be lost and consigned there along...

I'll share what Catholicism says first: "''Reason and sense demand the acceptance of one or the other of these alternatives: either Protestantism and the keeping holy of Saturday, or Catholicity and the keeping holy of Sunday. Compromise is impossible.'' John Cardinal Gibbons, The Catholic...

How about you provide a direct link to the document itself? I'd like to see what is there. Or better yet, how about copying and pasting the "truthful" letter that you claim refutes the version that I posted?

Catholics, hear what your own cardinals have to say: This is an ultimatum from the cardinals of the Roman court to Pope Julius III immediately after his ascension to the papal throne in 1550. It is contained in a historical document of Reformation times that is preserved in the National...

Read the quote from your cardinals.

While there are verses that seem to appear to teach OSAS, the truth is that there are others that clearly do not, which means those that appear to do so must be revisited. Unfortunately, the ratio of one's desire to seek truth whatever it may be to the desire to hold onto cherished beliefs often...

No, it is not possible, because not I nor do other teachers in my Christian denomination apply a "private" interpretation to the Bible, as all other denominations do. If everyone would go to the Bible and the Bible alone for their doctrines, and allow the Bible itself to interpret itself for us...