Search results

No one is suggesting that the yoke of the ceremonial law of Moses be placed on the neck of New Covenant Christians - what we are saying is that you are not a liberty to cast off the Ten Commandments of God - a separate and distinct law from the law of Moses - which is written by the Holy Spirit...

Amen, which is exactly why this equation is false: Old Covenant = Law If the Old Covenant was "the Law", then we should be able to substitute "the Law" for "Old Covenant" in Romans 3:31 KJV: "Do we then make void the (Old Covenant) through grace? God forbid, we establish the (Old Covenant)."...

The suggestion that a "contextual" interpretation demands no active command to cease from work is false because it ignores both the New Covenant law on your heart to keep the Fourth Commandment and verse 10 of Hebrews 4: that we who rest in Christ are to cease from the same work that God ceased...

The Pishitta version says exactly what I said. The word "rest" is "Kataposis" throughout chapter 4 EXCEPT in verse 9, where it is "Sabbatismos", which refers not to plain old rest, but to Sabbathkeeping, which is why the Pishitta translates it so. I haven't removed anything, it it you who have...

Hebrews 4:9 KJV says that Sabbathkeeping remains for the people of God, so whether you keep it on Saturday or Sunday, to deny that the commandment exists at all is to deny Scripture.

Yes, I'm not getting some things...like an answer to the OP question from you Jesuit Futurists because your pathetic devotion to Jesuit Futurism has no answer to it. Paul speaks of the "falling away" apostasy that must occur before the Second Coming of Christ in 2 Thessalonians, but Paul, Jesus...

Absolutely, there is no verse that refers to a "7 years of tribulation". What is used to refer to such is the last week of Daniel's 70, which Historicism says was history and fulfilled by Christ, not future and fulfilled by Antichrist, and its interpretation is a perfectly plausible, sensible...

Both "man of sin" (2 Thessalonians 2:4 KJV) and "man of God" (2 Timothy 3:17 KJV) refer to a plurality, not one single man, yet you insist that the first one MUST refer to "one single man", Because of your willful ignorance of church history and the Great Apostasy that took place when the Papal...

You are correct. God is three persons, not one entity. Some claim this is evidence that Christianity is polytheism, but nothing is further from the truth. The three are one in mind, in unity, in purpose, yet they are three separate entities: When the Second Person in the Godhead (Son) was...

I disagree, because he's spouting Jesuit errors. We are better off listening to some of what Lord Ian Paisley has to say: http://www.ianpaisley.org/main.asp

He didn't call anyone a bonehead - he referred to the bonehead idea of a Holy Spirit Restrainer as "bonehead". BTW, does the fact that you called him a bonehead now make you a "so-called" Christian as well? And your sad devotion to Jesuit Futurism compels you to not offer any explanation at all...

Yes, and His brother James agrees in James 5:29 KJV. What I mean is that after their resurrection, not a single person had anything to say about what was happening when they died. Lazarus didn't come out of the tomb and say, "Man, Jesus, why did you drag me back down to this rotten place?". The...

Brother, I've not accused you or anyone else of being a Jesuit, but simply inquired if it were so. However, I retract the question, seeing that Jesuits are generally highly intelligent, while you cannot discern the difference between an accusation and an inquiry.

Brother, how can I be a Jesuit when I oppose your hopeless devotion to Jesuit doctrine which prevents you from acknowledging even in the least the remarkably astounding unanimity of the Early Church Father's belief that the Restrainer was Pagan Rome, while you offer absolutely nothing to...

Sure, that goes for Catholics, Protestants, etc. - anyone who meets God's condition for salvation which is to accept Jesus as both Lord and Savior.

The "spirit of Antichrist" is that spirit which causes men to set themselves up in Christ's stead - to lord themselves over the flock while claiming the names, titles, and attributes of Christ, and was already in the world in Paul and John's day. The "Man of Sin" of 2 Thess. is Papal Rome...

Is he one of your Jesuit friends? If so, please forward this link which shows that the early church believed Paul identified Pagan Rome as the Restrainer which demands that the Antichrist has already arisen in the 6th century, and that his delusions of an end time removal of a Restrainer and...

Brother, please forgive me, but do you even read anything other than Jesuit ideas and your own rhetoric? Did I ever once question whether Paul revealed the Restrainer's identity? No, I have repeatedly acknowledged that Paul did just that as evidenced by 2 Thessalonians 2:5-6 KJV. The question I...

What verse in Scripture specifically says "7 years of tribulation"?

I think the reason why so many believe that God is not done with Israel is because they assume that all the OT promises of God pertain to the literal descendants of Abraham. They do not. The Bible specifically says that the only descendants of Abraham to which promises pertain are those who...