Search results

Yes, you do need to do all that: otherwise you are confusing people into believing that they are somehow saved through keeping the law; which is unscriptural. And therefore you would not be in the category of liar but would be classified more accurately as a deceiver in that by your preaching...

I am a very obedient person, and I do not feel the need to deflect my responsibility to obey God. However, I do understand that for the believer, keeping one's self from sinning is not a requirement but a privilege. We serve and obey the Lord because we love Him for that He has redeemed us...

Even if there isn't, and the majority believe that there are errors therein, Exodus 23:2a justifies my position.

God brought the Jewish people into a time in their own history wherein they even ate their own offspring. Very recently in the history of the world, there were people stuck on a mountain who ate the people that perished in order to survive their situation; and I don't condemn them for doing so.

I certainly will; because the kjv is indeed without error.

There is danger in your position; in that in holding to it one might begin to miss the subtle implication that they are somehow justified by not sinning (by keeping the law). I say to you verily that if you are justified by the law in any sense you are not justified through the Cross of Christ...

Yes, and even Noah was told that every moving thing would be food for him (Genesis 9:3).

Oh really I didn't know that before...:rolleyes:

You are simply not clear enough in what you are trying to say. It appears to me if not to the rest of us also that I am accurate in discerning that what you really believe is in fact what you say that I am "accusing you of". That I am accurate in my estimation of what you believe, but that you...

Also, please back up your statement. Provide a link to every post where I have ever accused you of any sin. I have not falsely accused you of seeking to be justified by the law. You have falsely accused me of having intentions of malice. I may have merely misunderstood what you were saying...

Therefore the food laws were not given to the nations that Israel was to be separate from.

You need to clarify your position. Because from all your statements it appears to every one of us that you are teaching that our justification comes through law-keeping. Why else is there all of this emphasis on how we must obey the food laws? If you really believed that we are justified by...

I was not trying to make myself look correct. I was defending the words of another. And you do the work of satan by accusing me of doing the work of satan; for he is the accuser of the brethren; and I am one of the brethren. That you are not is only evident from John 8:24.

I accept the findings of the scholars who translated the kjv. I hold His word to be authoritative. The devil seeks to destroy our trust in what we have in English and to make it a backbreaking proposition to get the real message of scripture.

Galatians 5:2-4 refers to those who are circumcised. Is that not referring to the Jews? 1 Corinthians 7:17-20 balances this out to a certain extent. If you are justified by the law, then you are fallen from grace. Sin is the transgression of the law; however, our entrance into the kingdom...

If I'm not mistaken, the food laws were given to Israel so that they would be separate from the other nations.

Sorry, posted post #912 before I saw post #911.

How did we get off-topic? The topic of this thread is, The Problem with the Trinity. I assume that since we have moved on, the problem has been resolved.

You require us to be obedient to the whole of the law in order to be saved; therefore those of us who believe in hell understand that you are saying that if we don't obey the law we are going to hell; and that is condemnation. Actually, those who subject themselves to the law and attempt to be...

Evidently you are the one who determines what those exceptions are in scripture...