Search results

Can you rephrase that in a normal tone that makes some sense?

That's what proves you wrong. The rich man and Lazarus has Proper names and locations. A parable is full of types. Overflowing with OBVIOUS types.

Let's assume it is a Parable. The component still SAY THE SAME THING. Paradise adjacent to hell. Abraham there. ..ahem, as all ot saints were. Torment in hell A place for righteous, and another for wicked. I forgot what the non paradise doctrine hopes to prove. Just another doctrine...

It is not a Parable. You are 100% wrong about it.

I have seen in the past where they move the comma concerning the their on the cross. Trying to make us think Jesus did not descend to paradise and preach to the captives. It is appalling that they change God's word.

Amil and postmil are way too bizarre for me. Waste of time totally.

Jesus himself declared the rapture pretrib. It is so easy to understand. I honestly think postribs see themselves running from cave to cave, trying to escape the Antichrist who is chasing after them with a sword to chop their heads off since they are so powerful and so awesome christians he...

I am not sure if we agree. Jesus made a few points. 1) before the flood time-frame. 2) God's people gathered into the ark. 3) one taken, one left ( 50 % of a certain group) 4) watch and be ready before the flood. Now...he made sure that in the preflood timeframe, there was normal life...

Depends on if you think normal life, and commerce, and everyday life, and planning for the future, is anything but what it says. What??? You think pretending it is not in the bible, is your basis for your doctrine???? Yep...you just basically admitted you can not defend the truth spoken by...

....not biblical. We see multiple people in the bible raptured to heaven without death. ...the church billions being in that precise dynamic.

Just the opposite. The devil has convinced men of no life after death. Doctrine straight from hell.

QUOTE "Before attempting any serious interpretation of this remarkable parable, it is essential to establish clearly that it does not present an actual depiction of life after death. Anyone reading this story literally, as a believer in the immortality of the soul, is likely to be led astray."...

Lol Jesus vividly described the setting of no tribulation. Andveven worse for you, "one taken, one left behind BEFORE THE FLOOD" "WATCH AND BE READY" ....who is taken BEFORE the flood????? Just unreal the doctrines men cling to. You just painted yourself into a hopeless position.

...and your doctrine has a different setting than Jesus declared. No way around it.

We are in the last days.

Jesus defined the setting of the rapture. In mat 24...(you know the sentences that destroy postrib doctrine.) Normal life. Ahem...exactly opposite your doctrine.

Yep. History defeats the historical position Preterism does not even begin to fit. It is comical watching them come up with the flying scorpions, hailstones of fire, the AC, the mark, innumerable number of Christians murdered for not receiving the mark, the mark in the forehead, no buying...

You just reaffirmed a confusion What you are doing is re establishing events and timelines. I know nobody with your prism and timelines. Your entire take is Based On "stars, moon, and sun" combined with a re establishing of trib vs wrath vs great trib. FROM THAT PRISM you proceed to make...

He comes after the 7 yr trib. Rev 19. So vivid and clear it would seem impossible to miss. Wake up. The trib is 7 yrs, with the last part having the wrath. The ac kicks it off ,(THE WHITE HORSE RIDER) and IN THE MIDDLE OF THE WEEK THE TEMPLE IS DESECRATED. The strict defining and isolation of...

No Last days means...cue drum roll.....LAST DAYS.