Search results

I've always believed that Ez. 37 &38 are prophecies of the post millennial war and 39 is post Armageddon.

I understand all this but you didn't answer my question..."So my question is where and in what context do you see the scriptures saying it is okay for women to teach men in the church (public) setting?"

Hi 101G, First for the discussion of these two texts G2338 is not used so it's kind of irrelevant. G1135 is what is used and the same word has been translated as woman, women or wife. The context of 1Cor. 14 is the public exercise of spiritual gifts and if you want to emphasize a married woman...

I did emphasize a qualified male.

I never implied that I was part of the majority in #77. The only thing I would say to that is that most Christians are pre-millennial and I do agree with that but after that the schism is wide spread.

I agree with all three points but perhaps an assumption is made about #3. Although the word "church" isn't used, there are many other phrases used that are describing the church. I think that because of the GT, the church goes from being a corporate entity it goes back to individual...

I'm not part of that group because I'm know what to watch for as Christ told us to. It's the pre-tribs and amils that won't be ready.

Just so you know, they were not MY questions, the answers were mine.

You need to read it again. Here's the CEV: 10 On that day (a future day) God’s people will (future tense) rest from their work, just as God rested from his work. 11 We should do our best to enter that place of rest, so that none of us will disobey and miss going there (When we die), as they did.

The EU is not part of the eastern empire, they are part of the western empire. I guess that depends on which description of the a/c you are referring. Personally, I believe America will become the harlot of Rev. 17

I'm as prepared as I can be and by that I mean are you ready to be a martyr? Is your wife? child? It's going to get a whole lot worse.

Hi 101G, You will have to show me that verse. It will be that way in heaven but not here on earth. A lot of modern opinions might consider God a sexist but there is logic to his plan. Eph. 5:22-24 explains the hierarchy and 1Tim. 2:11 is quite plain. Your argument is with God, not me.

vs. 11 explains it.

Hi Scott, We must agree to disagree as we are miles apart prophetically speaking but this is part of Satan's plan to divide the church and disguise the truth of prophecy by offering multiple interpretations, so that in the end most Christians will be confused and unprepared for what is about to...

I agree Ivor, there is no sense in symbolizing the 144,000+ literal Jews who will enter the earthly millennial kingdom.

If you consider Dan. 9:26..."the people of the prince" The Roman army used mostly conscripted soldiers from neighboring nations in their attack against Jerusalem. When you consider the rest of the prophecy regarding the a/c, Dan. 11:21 to the end, it really makes much more sense than a western...

I don't think it ever says end but "until the time of the Gentiles is fulfilled", proving yet again that we speaking of a future event.

Could you clarify your first paragraph? I do agree however that Jesus shall never be in the "flesh" again that can die but He will always be in His resurrected style body.

God created time for man's sake...we should be able to discern which view should be used within the context of the scripture.

Water Baptism symbolizes our being raised up in Christ to be a new man but I still maintain that Christ is in effect saying, The generation that sees all these things...this is the generation that shall not pass until all is fulfilled.