Search results

1 Cor. vss align with vs. 11 but vs. 12 is a different topic. Regarding that verse, God created a hierarchy for a purpose so I am in agreement that a woman should not pastor if their is a qualified man in the congregation.

I see we agree that it will be a ten-nation confederacy of Eastern Rome, not Western Rome as is the popular opinion.

That verse is speaking of the eternal rest we have to look forward to.

I believe that America is on it's way to becoming the Babylon of Rev. 17 & 18. The next liberal president just might tip the scales, imo.

On that issue I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.

Rome simply doesn't have the power that it had earlier in the last century. I don't believe it has any end-time significance at all except the possibility that a pope may be the false prophet but certainly not the a/c. Neither can these things which scripturally are shown to be individuals, can...

Regarding the CorelIssue post you are responding to...The temple described in Ezekial was originally intended to be the 2nd temple but Israel failed to live up to God's expectations, so they were never given the opportunity to build what was described or to enjoy the vastly enlarged nation. That...

Actually, there is a sound, logical reason for 1Tim. 2:11. In those days women sat separately from their husbands or men in general. When the gospel was being preached in the synagogues, it was real news and very different from what the women had always heard, so they would unwittingly disrupt...

We know that but the Jews don't. That's the whole point of His return to take back what rightfully belongs to Him. The A/c will temporarily usurp the throne.

I believe that Heb. 4 shows us that every day is now the Sabbath as we rest in Christ's finished work on a daily basis. The "Sabbath" was a type for the reality.

For those that might not know, this was 2 Thess. 2:1-4 but we can see what the future fulfillment will look like in Rev. 13:4-6, 14-15.

' Well of course, that was the whole point, He taught and lived and died under the law so that we wouldn't have to.

, I don't deny it, it just doesn't have "great" trib size or significance.

no Dave, they don't. To an eternal God, past, present and future are all the same, so speaking in the present tense about a future occurrance is just par for the course and per my previous point, all of the NT is speaking inn the present tense except for prophecies.

I hate to speak so lightly of the subject but there have been way to many things that have occurred historically that really dwarfs 70ad. Matt. 24:21 just wasn't that big of a deal from a tragedy standpoint.

When we speak forward in faith, the verb tenses don't necessarily equate with the reality, that is what faith is all about.

Hi Enoch, While Daniel's 70th week is our timeline, nowhere in the bible does it speak of a seven year period of tribulation, that is a man-made concoction. Yes, there are several different measurable 3 1/2 periods mentioned in Rev. but none of them describe themselves as the first or latter...

My opinion, Acts 2:17-18 began at Pentecost, Acts 2:19-21 still future. Peter was just quoting the whole prophecy to show the context that this was prophecy coming true.

Hi Hidden, Your #2 is an excellent point, thanks.