Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. C

    A Simple Way To Recognize The FINAL Beast Kingdom

    Great question! There are 4 and only 4 metal kingdoms that God would reveal in His plan of restoration and salvation for His people and His city (and of course, since they rejected and crucified Him, He designed His plan to be more than just the restoration of His people and city back to...
  2. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    I am sorry but I have answered those questions a few times in addition to the long narratives I sent you. I would kindly ask you to re-read my responses #’s 258, 265, 287, 303, and 305. Thanks so much.
  3. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    I have already answered those questions. Please take a short bit of time and re-read some of my responses to you- you should not have a problem seeing them. Best wishes.
  4. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    I have repeatedly given you a detailed response to the 70 weeks. I have gone into great details at times - and have even read where you do not think it is appropriate to write such long resolve cut paste the narratives that clearly offer my hand interpretations So, I don’t believe we need to...
  5. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    I believe we have studied Daniel very differently and have different interpretations. Thanks.
  6. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    To be candid, I do feel that I’ve taken the time to lay out a fairly complete framework. At the same time, it seems there’s a reluctance to consider that prophecy—especially in Daniel and Revelation—often involves more than one layer of meaning or fulfillment. One of the key things I’ve come to...
  7. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    I believe I made it clear the 70 year prophecy was completely fulfilled by the Messiah despite that He was cut off in the midst of the week. There was no unfinished business- He fulfilled 9:24 and returned to His Father. “It is finished.” I also spoke about the 490 year 4th and final Great...
  8. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    I think part of the issue here is you maybe treating “symbolic” and “literal” as if they cancel each other out, when Scripture often presents both at the same time. For example, in Daniel 9 we see this very clearly. In verses 24–25, the prophecy includes both spiritual and physical...
  9. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    David, here is a cut / paste from the Daniel chapter 9 narrative. When one studies the 70 weeks of prophecy and attempts to establish the correct starting date (457BC) from the other 3 available starting dates, it demands that the study must not simply accept one of the 4 dates but confirm it...
  10. C

    Four horseman in Revelation

    But what are those 4 kingdoms?
  11. C

    Four horseman in Revelation

    Thanks for your thoughts Marty! If you do not mind, does chapters 2 and 7 tell us who the 4 kingdoms are? Thanks.
  12. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    Okay, I am going to ask if you would please tell me why you made this statement. If we are to have a productive back and forth / give and take discussion on these difficult matters in Daniel, I am going to need to understand why you have no idea what I was saying. Please tell me at least what...
  13. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    I certainly agree with you, but the complete destruction of the Temple and everything else in Jerusalem was the consquence of the Jews rejecting and crucifying their Messiah - that was the abominable act that would CAUSE the desolation with His people for the next 2000 years. The destruction of...
  14. C

    Four horseman in Revelation

    Hope you do not mind, but Epiphanes has absolutely nothing to do within the Book of Daniel. Most scholars contend that he is prominately discussed in chapter 11 but he is not found in chapter 11 or any other chapter. He can not be the little horn because the little horn came out of the 4th...
  15. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    Unless I am misunderstanding you, I believe I have talked about the completion / unfinished business relating to the 70 weeks in #250 above. Let me know if that is what you are talking about and if that answers your concern. Thanks.
  16. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    I don't understand! The pasting from within my commentary is indeed my final interpretations on Daniel. Did the 3 discussions on Matthew, Mark and Luke fail to address a certain part of a question you had posed?
  17. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    Thank you again and you are right - we agree on so much. I would ask that you might comment on the earlier post - Parts 1 and 2 which discuss the 3 verses and let me know your thoughs. Further, if you might need an additional level of support for why the cross is the AOD, please let me know --...
  18. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    David, I don't think we were able to continue our discussion on the 10 elements which may be causing so much confusion in chapter 9. And I think you will agree, there is not just one scholarly interpretation out there. There are more than a few quoted scholars that share a very different set of...
  19. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    Part 2 Partial commentary found in Daniel 9:27: Luke: Jerusalem Surrounded—Desolation Made Visible Luke takes yet another path. He does not cite Daniel by name, nor does he use sanctuary language (“holy place”) or symbolic language (“where it ought not”). Instead, he provides the visible...