Search results

Are you referencing the APA as an authority?

Nope. Every verse was from the NT Grace.

Again, you ignore verses inconvenient for your doctrine and allow only verses for discussion that support your position. I trust anyone reading these exchanges recognize the intellectual dishonesty of your posts.

The OSAS crowd wants to ignore the conditional implication of “IF.” If we don’t walk in the light is an option with the negation Of what follows: We do NOT have fellowship with each other The blood of Christ does NOT cleanse us from all sin. Otherwise, the conditional IF serves no purpose in...

There is no bigger contradiction than confidence = fear. This is true despite your indoctrination of pivoting from you to God. Appeal to Diversion. How confident are you? I’m confident … in someone else.

@Eternally Grateful just cannot bring himself to address his contradiction. He simply doubles down on the trope of a free gift, side stepping our burden to act after the fact. If sin was taken care of on the cross, then universalism is correct doctrine?

So, absolutely no need to fear God one little bit? Doesn't sound too biblical.

Indeed. There should be such profound gratitude and humility that one seeks to make not disappointing the unearned favor. A human example. A parent of a small, beloved child takes a much needed shower. The child escapes the house and finds her way onto the busy street. Just as the parent gets...

To paraphrase what I wrote in another thread, only a fool could believe an all knowing God would send his son to suffer and die horribly for lip service. "Ibull eve" is insufficient; a transformed life, starting with genuine and complete repentance is the ante. Philippians 2:12, "work out your...

Says you. Only others have burden for inferences. Welcome to my ignore list.

I primarily pray for Trump's protection from demonic forces and the snakes plotting daily for his destruction as well as to be guided by the Holy Spirit to make decisions that are best for the country and glorify God.

We’re all still patiently waiting for the verse where Christ Himself identifies the current generation listening to him that you claim He meant by “THIS generation." Book. Chapter. Verse please...

Yes I did answer the question - just not the way you want. See post #21. Also, you still didn’t answer the question.

And so do we consent to the indwelling of the spirit EVERY TIME we are tempted and decide to kill our will and obey the will of God. Jesus said “follow me,“ which is NOT one and done. We choose anew to follow him with each step. I‘m reminded of mercy shown to people who commit terrible crimes...

Where does Jesus say, “Although I’m speaking ABOUT end times not too soon, the people listening TO me now in THIS generation, will not pass before the end comes? Book. Chapter. Verse.

Real faith include work. The relationship is obvious. FAITH = BELIEF + ACTION Anyone who thinks an all knowing God sent his son to suffer and die horribly for lip service is foolish. Anyone can say they believe. Demons believe. Belief does not make a transformative life. Saying you believe...

I don’t think God is a rapist, do you?

It does. You’re in denial that it does. TO and ABOUT are the generations the text contains as is normal language usage.

Neither and irrelevant. You are hung up on this foolishness; It’s a question of referring to the audience at the time OR the time when the signs under discussion happen. Both are plausible from the text. It’s understanding language usage. Suppose I tell you about a conversation I had with my...

Like inferring from Christ's words that "this generation" refers to those who were listening to him speak.