Search results

"These are simply voters." What is a "these?" Generalizations are woefully unhelpful. Not all supporters are cultists, regardless of the aisle side. Thanks for helping to prove my point, though. .

Well, that is, after all, what we (American) English-speakers do with words. It's also know as "weaponizing." .

You folks really kill me. I think he was a great President in many ways and I'm a Navy brat as well as an Air Force veteran, so I have a strong sense of loyalty to Presidents—especially while they're in office. But it's not surprising that since Trump cultists don't even know themselves, they...

Hey, cut the guy some slack. Some folks just prefer their gatherings to be free of people of color. It's not like we have an amendment to our Constitution that prohibits that kind of thing. :P :P :P What color is a snowflake? .

I hope Trump isn't that Barabbas guy. Where have I heard that? .

That's assuming his head is on a stationary swivel. Which is not to say that his life wasn't spared by God. It was. But the jury's still out on whether God has ordained him to be the savior of the world. Wait, no it isn't. We already have One. .

You shouldn't be quoting Scripture, you know; people will talk. .

"God, I thank Thee, that I am not as other men are, tomoto-throwers, 20-year-old kids whose minds got warped during the COVID lockdown, or even this Democrat..."

I'm all for law and order—even if violence is necessary to maintain it. I'm a veteran. I'm not sure recruiting and paying civilians at a political rally to brutalize tomato-throwers would be a good example of that, though. .

So it's clear that no amount or quality of evidence that conservative expression could encourage violence would satisfy you. Fair enough. .

You need context for "Knock the hell/crap out of them." Well, I knew, at least, that going right to the top of the food chain would spare us all a lot of unnecessary equivocating and skullduggery. So, here's your context: That's right—he wanted his loyal followers to do extensive bodily...

Yeah, I've always believed that the best way to cause division is to call for a reduction in divisive rhetoric from both sides. Btw, "KNOCK THE CRAP OUT OF THEM, WOULD YOU? OKAY? SERIOUSLY, JUST KNOCK THE HELL.. I PROMISE YOU, I WILL PAY FOR THE LEGAL FEES, I PROMISE." But he didn't really...

I'm not worthy. :tiphat: .

"God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican..." "Us and them" .

"Their claim" "Us-and-them" Angels weep. .

So you can just dismiss it as "far-right" stuff that doesn't count? Right. It was dark outside when I was born but it wasn't last night. .

How utterly naive to think that just because the right's threats don't make it onto cable news, they don't exist, as if conservative politics makes for better mental health. It seems I don't even have to descend into bonafide goading to get your fur to flying these days. :P .

What I mean is that you responded to a post from me about toning down the rhetoric on all sides by emphasizing the rhetoric on one side—which you're still doing, btw. I know you don't like being challenged, though, so it's ok. .

Granted, I'm not the least bit convinced that the majority of what's reported by any outlet is reliable, but it's starting to look like the Trump SS detail have been emphatically requesting help for months to meet increasing threats, and have been summarily dismissed by DHS—undeniably under...

"He hit me first?" .