Search results

Oh yes, it does when it says the true God who made the elevations and the earths, and especially when the virgin birth was predicted.

The bible never calls Jesus out as YHWH.

It is an indefinite article which a noun case with nouns and infinitive verbs. The JW is correct, but I wouldn't want him as a neighbor.

Epiphanius helps but you have to speculate who is a Merinthus and who is a Cerinthus. The mystery is solved a bit this way, and we do know Ignatius was a Valentinian who thought Jesus was the one true God, and not a trinity at first. Jesus was a morpher in his view.

The law was given to decrease sin. Was Job a sinner, or just ignorant of his friends lacking productivity?

They are authentically gods, but they are not the true creator.

The syntax of Greek is underestimated, while English syntax is overrated.

Three that act as one, but they aren't required to have the same existence. The English word trinity requires it.

Why are there 2 different versions of the abomination which causes desolation?

The three in the trinity are not the same existence.

Most religions were backed by the state to some degree at the time. The literacy problem was worse.

Compared to Greek, English would be inadequate for the time and task.

He was known as a doubter, and the Sadducees taught God doesn't wake the dead.

The talmud doesn't quote the entire LXX. Try to find if it is there.

I have noticed this should be [in] unorthodox theology

No, that is precisely what the statement says, as I read it. Christ's coming to gather his people cannot take place unless the Apostasy takes place first, which involves the revelation of Antichrist leading to his ultimate destruction at the Coming of Chirst. Perhaps, the main anti-christ was...

Instead of: “Come, let us go down, and there confound their language” (Genesis 11:7), which indicates multiple authorities, they wrote in the singular: Come, let me go down, and there confound their language.

But the Cerinthus Valentinus had no such problem. There was more than one Cerinthus.

There is absolutely no way that modern bibles are completely translated from scratch. if thou buy a basic grammar book for translators, you will find that not all the syntax is known.

It is literal and perhaps wrong. It would work better in Anglo-Saxon. Though assuming one name with 3 possessives could be a mistake in older English.