Search results

Joseph didn't have any other children either. Some Jews were mistaken. Yet Jesus did call them his brothers.

That definition was given by Jesus, and doesn't follow in all NT usage. Roman "Catholics" don't know Greek, proving they are not the original church but merely Latin proselytes.

Petros is what makes a rock. Peter was a rock-maker at least metaphorically. Petra is a rock, and tauta is other. On this other a rock, he built his own Assembly. The rock is not Peter, which is obvious from the Greek which the neo-Romans no longer use, but it is Jesus who is also the rejected rock.

Or perhaps the NT originally had the tetragrammaton rather than kurios.

No, it isn't. The earlier copies are thought to have the Hebrew name of God in them, which in fact have instead of kurios. The consensus is imaginary at the least on your part.

The life like Enoch. And being near Jerusalem, I would suspect few are righteous there. Your opinions are not even fact.

The woke body was after he died on the cross, and the resurrected body was after 3 days. I would hope not to need a resurrected body like Lazarus.

Hell is not the default. The default is most are not translated fast like Enoch, Jesus, Paul etc.

@Jack Inflected: εὑρίσκοντες Root: εὑρίσκω Strong's: G2147 English: find Code: V-PAP-NPM Long: Verb - Present Active Participle - Nominative Plural Masculine Few were ones then finding it.

It is my belief that only the dying are saved, even then some are put in Hades rather than Kingdom of God.

Show me where oral tradition rather than written tradition is to be revered.

Actually, the ambiguity is not the original languages, but the translation languages. The clear rule is that it has to be inspired by God. The book or Esther was never inspired by him.

But according to the Masoretic Text, it is just supernatural as a virgin conception. It makes it easier for Bar Kochbas to claim christship or messiahship. (Whichever term you prefer.)

An almah having a child is not a supernatural event. I don't trust the entire Tenak. By the grace of God, the important stuff about creation wasn't altered much.

Textual Variant of the LXX and New Testament of "Isaiah 7:14"

The LXX did have the Hebrew letters of HIS name before it was replaced with kurios.

Yahweh's name is used before the prophecy.

The error is there, nonetheless.

Isaiah checked his wife for virginity, and pregnancy. He was wondering if it was her. But the Masoretic Text says Almay, supporting Bar Kochba as the final messiah.

The LXX and Justin Martyr are the only other witnesses to word betulah being originally used.