Search results

His view in particular defies simple math if he insists each week consists of 7 literal days, and is then trying to fit 1260 literal days within that. 1260 days is 1253 days more than 7 literal days. It's even more than 490 literal days. It is 770 days more than 490 days. It's his math I'm...

Preterists are not the only ones deceived about some of these things. Take @Truth7t7, for instance. He is clearly not a Preterist, yet he is among some of the most decieved ppl I have ever encountered. Not because he places great tribulation in the future, but because he insists the entire 70...

LOL. Don't be ridiculous. No one in their right mind takes your view seriously to begin with. As in no one, as in zero. I'm not the one way way way out in left field here, you are. I'm not the one who has issues with basic simple 3rd grade math, but maybe you do. That's what I'm trying to find...

I already know where you place the beginning of the 42 months during this alleged 70th literal week. What I want to know is this. Do you have the the 70th week ending 1256 and 1/2 days prior to when the 1260 days end? Or do you have this 1260 days that you have beginning in the middle of this...

Let me ask you this if I can stop laughing first at your proposterous proposed math. This 3.5 years, are they literal years? If yes, how many literal days does 3.5 years involve? Can they fit within a time period involving 7 literal days? After all, you yourself insist 490 literal days are meant.

Revelation 20:12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. To remain consistent, thus not be...

To me it still comes across as bizarre that someone can be an Amil and then hold a view such as this, a dispy view that mainly Pretribbers hold. I don't have an issue with an Amil holding this view--The Great tribulation of Matthew 24:21 is future unfulfilled. But to add to that, this---when...

In that case I was adding to what you said, not disputing it.

Did you not read my post carefully first? First I said this--- I'm basically saying that God used Mary as a means to create the human body of Jesus. Therefore, Mary shared in the creating of His body since his body was created inside of her. But not to be conflated with that of the following...

It's simple. Both OSAS and NOSAS are true. Though, OSAS means once saved always saved, we cannot apply that universally to everyone saved. That's where the mistake is, applying OSAS to every single confessed saved person. It then contradicts that some confessed saved ppl fall away instead, thus...

I think I somewhat understand where you are basically coming from. And if so, I basically agree with you over all. Unlike JWs, you are not saying Jesus was a created being. You are only meaning His human body here. Obviously, His human body was created at some point, otherwise we have to...

NM. Replied to the wrong post so I then deleted it and replied to the post I had in mind to begin with.

This charge of replacement theology makes no sense. How can anyone be replacing anyone if the ones allegedly being replaced are equally part of the ones being charged with replacement theology? Replacement theology apparently means, according to that view, that the church replaces the Jews...

Daniel 12:2 And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt. This verse plainly says that something is sleeping in the dust of the earth, and that what is sleeping in the dust of the earth shall awake at...

Here is maybe a way to look at it, and that it seems to maybe support Amil not Premil unless you can think of a way it could support Premil instead. I seriously don't care which view is actually Biblical, whether it be Premil or Amil. The issue is this. In my mind, if Amil is Biblical I then can...

What do you think I am proposing? I already mentioned two things, your proposed interpretation and the typical interpretation, and that I said there is yet another option. Can't be either of those if there is another option. Except this other option is not a view I currently hold, yet it is the...

What point are you trying to make over all? That maybe Amil is true Premil isn't?

I agree it means that in regards to the saved. I already argued why I disagree that the lost are meant as well. For one thing, if some of the lost are raised and judged before all of the lost are even dead first, what about the lost that die afterwards? What resurrection event are they raised...

As to John 14:3 that has been brought up. There is another option besides your proposed interpretation and the typical interpretation. John 14:1 Let not your heart be troubled: ye believe in God, believe also in me. 2 In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have...

How does Revelation 11 possibly support Amil, in light of these things below throughout my post here? Look what all happens after the 7th trumpet has already sounded. You don't do those things to someone already dead, such as what is recorded in verse 15 and 19 below. And the seventh angel...