Search results

He didn't ascend into the Kingdom of God?

ABSOLUTELY INCORRECT. DO YOU CARE TO... PROVE IT? Why should I wait for him to return?

But it isn't the literal translation.

ὅτι ὁ θεὸς ἀγάπη ἐστίν, because how a God the consideration, he or it is. I guess it is a good example. "because God is the consideration."?

It is plainly wrong. Ho logos is nominative starting the next sentence. Similar things happen with the neuter case, but the neuter case is both object then subject.

[Rev 3:11 KJV] 11 Behold, I come quickly: hold that fast which thou hast, that no man take thy crown. [Rev 22:7, 12, 20 KJV] 7 Behold, I come quickly: blessed [is] he that keepeth the sayings of the prophecy of this book. ... 12 And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward [is] with me, to give...

The second coming was a rapture. Is John still on earth? I am serious.

ho Theos een ho logos is not an equivalent to ho Theos ho logos.

ὅτι ὁ θεὸς ἀγάπη ἐστίν, how a God the consideration, he or it is. I guess it is a good example. "how God is the consideration."?

"At the start it was a word," since I believe αρχη is the start of anything. It is all natural except the phrase, " and a word was with a God,". This phrase means the worder originated with God, and implies his OT name.

At a "beginning" is not what you want theologically; and the beginning is not being introduced because it does not have the article. But the LOGOS is not introduced and so is God; so thusly, there is need to indicate to this. Few things are introduced in the English NT, because of the myths...

At a beginning? Why the lack of consistency?

Then how do human names become definite without the main Greek article, since they don't have it usually. Plural mass nouns which are spelled singular in English have no equivalent in Greek. They are forced into the English by guess games. As for the indefinite article being ενας or μια; this...

It is an indefinite article. It is rarely before human names-- i.e. ονομαι..

Let us play it your way. "At the start was a word, and a word was with a god, and the God was." YHWH was the worder. Notice how your translation obscures it. I also divided the sentences differently, true. It helps my case when I know outos means other in a demonstrative sense. I have not found...

The sentence is "kai theos en"; "ho logos" begins the next sentence. The it could be anything and is part of the verb, but the Greek is not the same as our equivalent verb. And there is the highest God. I am using better methods.

The subject is theos. "And the God, it was."

LOGOS is an actual grammatical term in Greek. But it isn't necessarily equivalent to the English 'word'.

It is correct but implausible. And 'hn' is a 3rd person singular verb. It always needs a subject.

At the beginning, it was a worder, and a worder it was with a God, and the God it was. A worder another it was at the beginning with a God.