Search results

Per the 2nd scenario, in this understanding, the spirit would be an external force—something that originates from God and isn’t inherently part of us. This concept resonates with my experience in creating 3D animations, where I work with characters, especially humans. In 3D animation, there are...

There are a cpl of ways that I can think of to look at this. One thing that seems obvious, the fact this part applies to both the saved and lost---Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was. Then so must this part apply to both the saved and lost--and the spirit shall return unto God who...

Even if you are correct, and maybe you are for all I know, it still doesn't equal Jesus coming into His kingdom that same day He died. And no way can being in the heart of the earth be meaning His kingdom, paradise. Obviously, when the thief said kingdom, Jesus interpreted that for us as...

LOL. Acts 1:11 Which also said, Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven? this same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven. And what would like manner look like in reverse? If He starts out being bodily upon...

Here's something else to think about in case you haven't. Luke 23:42 And he said unto Jesus, Lord, remember me when thou comest into thy kingdom. 43 And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise. A lot of interpreters interpret this to mean that...

I'm Premil myself and I fully disagree with it involving that. And to be clear, I do not agree with how Amils interpret it either. What it is involving is the following, pertaining to the goats. But not according to me, but according to the crystal clear passages below. Matthew 24:48 But and...

Which, BTW, proves that the following is not already true, but not that it won't be true, but that it's not true yet. Meaning in regards to the fate of those such as the rich man. Luke 16:24 And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of...

In that day is referring to an era of time pertaining to events involving His first coming through his 2nd coming, then the millennium that follows. How is it reasonable that some of what Isaiah 11 records, so does Isaiah 65 record, but that the former is not involving the same era of time the...

Come on, pay attention to context. Like such. Mark 12:18 Then come unto him the Sadducees, which say there is no resurrection; and they asked him, saying, Mark 12:26 And as touching the dead, that they rise: have ye not read in the book of Moses, how in the bush God spake unto him, saying...

As to souls in general, what point are you trying to make here to begin with? When ppl physically die the first death, including both the saved and lost, their soul doesn't die as well, right? Obviously then, even upon death of the physical body the soul remains alive, regardless. Even the...

Start by convincingly proving that the following are the same thing. But the rest of the dead lived not again BODILY until the thousand years were finished. The rest of the dead and those that have part in the first resurrection lived not again BODILY until the thousand years were finished...

It doesn't matter because the following undeniably 100% proves that those meant in verse 4 and 6 already live again bodily at the beginning of the thousand years---------- But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the trump card that can't be...

This means you have no issue with God burning babies and children to a crisp during the 2nd coming? Right? IOW, you find that perfectly acceptable, for example, that a saved mother that recently gave birth to a child, that she is then raptured to safety while her recently born child is left...

And while you're at it since you do take 2 Peter 3:10-12 literally, that it means the entire planet is literally engulfed in flames, therefore, burning babies, children, adults, animals, etc, to a crisp, why don't you point out for us anywhere in Revelation 19 since it too involves the 2nd...

Even the Premils that don't believe in soul sleep don't agree with you. So let's not act like that it's only because he believes in soul sleep is why he doesn't agree with you. There are no souls reigning with Christ in heaven. And the 5th seal recorded in Revelation 6 proves it. But I'm not...

Speaking of Psalms 2. Psalms 2:8 Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession. 9 Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel. What about this part---I shall...

It likely means in a sense such as the following. 1 John 2:15 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. But once Jesus returns with the kingdom, one then should love this world since it will then be a new...

We're talking about post #4, correct? If yes, the only thing I see that I said in regards to ignoring anything was this---I guess we just ignore the 'now' recorded in that verse, right? And then this---Unless one is a Preterist, most of the rest of us see this pertaining to His 2nd coming being...

But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished(Revelation 20:5) This 100% trumps any and all arguments Amil has, period. Amil cannot get around this part. And that this part undeniably proves that those who have part in the first resurrection already lived again...

Premils, such as me, and I can't speak for all Premils, tend to understand the following like such. Revelation 20:4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God...