Search results

prayers.. :pray:

Definitely on my mind... :IDK:

Happy birthday, brother @bro.tan. We hope your day is filled with blessings and good things as you celebrate another year with your family and friends. GHtsBlhtYHT With love and blessings from Angelina and the team at Christianity Board. xox

Happy birthday, brother @The Barbarian. We hope you have an awesome day celebrating another year in service to our Lord and King with family and friends. GHtsBlhtYHT With love and blessings from Angelina and the team at Christianity Board. xox

@Eternal Entity, Thank you for explaining your framework more clearly. I want to stay focused on one specific point so I can properly evaluate it. You’re saying that familiarity, consistency, fruit, and relational alignment allow someone to discern truth. My question is still this: If two...

@Eternal Entity, “If neither physical nor non-physical entities have been observed creating universes, why does observation rule out one but not the other? What principle, not appeal to observation, selects physicality as the default explanation at that level?”

I do not believe this is CyB, although I'm sure it can get chaotic like this some days :bigCeeze

Thanks again @Eternal Entity I think the key point I'm still struggling with is P6. You say that a non-physical source producing physical effects creates an explanatory gap because we have no observed examples of such causation. “But have we ever observed anything physical create an entire...

Thank you for clarifying @Eternal Entity If I understand correctly, you're saying that the Source itself is physical and that all created things are expressions of that physical Source. What I'm still trying to understand is how that conclusion follows from the evidence you mention. We can...

Prayers :pray:

@Eternal Entity. I think we’re not agreeing on what counts as an explanation, so we might be missing each other’s point. It seems like your view only accepts explanations that work through physical or natural processes. But I don’t see where that rule has been proven yet. It looks like it’s...

Hi @Eternal Entity. Thank you for your reply. I’ve read through your post, but I don’t think it directly answers the questions I was asking. Basically, I was asking for a clear understanding of your view on this: Who is Jesus in relation to the Father? And are they two distinct persons, or the...

Good morning William. @Eternal Entity, I appreciate the clarity of your framework and the attempt to build a full explanatory chain. There are several strong instincts in your argument, especially the rejection of infinite regress and the recognition that consciousness is not easily reducible...

Good morning, @Eternal Entity, Thank you for your reply. One statement in particular caught my attention: "My choice not to self identify as a Christian has nothing to do with avoiding The Christ." I'd be interested to hear more about that. :clmSmlx You speak of the Father, creation, and the...

Hmm... :IDK:@Eternal Entity, I think there's a possible gap in the way you’re building your conclusion. You start with "If the universe is created, that implies a Creator" and then move into “agnostic theism” as a reasonable label. That part of the reasoning is coherent on a philosophical level...

I had my early morning prayer time with the Lord. Then later in the morning I went for a prayer walk, listening to the book of Mark. I am getting prepared for a weekly prayer walk with my PW friend in the not too distant future, so I want to stay fit. I also stopped off at the gym on my way home...