Search results

This is hilarious coming from a Protestant . . . Two of your main doctrinal pillars (Sola Scriptura & Sola Fide) are man-made, 16th century inventions that were never taught by the historic Christian Church. Neither are they taught in Scripture. As for countering the “truth” about what YOU...

And, acoording to His Word - you can throw it away . . . (Matt. 7:19-23, Matt. 10:22, Matt. 24:13, Matt. 25:31–46, John 15:1-6, Rom. 11:22, 1 Cor. 4:4, 1 Cor. 9:27, 1 Cor. 10:12, 1 Tim. 4:1, 1 Tim. 4:16, 2 Tim. 2:12, Heb. 3:6, Heb. 3:12-14, Heb. 6:4-6, Heb. 10:26-27, 2 Pet. 2:20-21, 2 Pet. 3:17...

I didn't think you'd be able to refute the vertses I presented - and I was right . . .

No - God doesn't promise OSAS. This is another 16th century Protestant invention. Salvatio is conditional in nScripture. This is why it includes so many warnings in Scripture about how a person can LISE his secuyre position . . . Romans 11:22 “See, then, the kindness and severity of God...

WRONBG. Your entire argument collapses here with the Jewish leaders. The ONL thing they could have legally stoned Jesus for was blasphemy – which is what they were trying to do in John 8:59. There is NO other reason for trying to kill Him here, given the context. Additionally, Jesus’s answer...

No - this is the very reason I brought up the roles of each Person in the Godhead. In the Son's role, He unites to Himself two dnatures - deithy and humanity. The only part of the Son that was "made" was His flesh. Phil. 2:6-11 is another excellent example of the metaphorcal language often...

And nobody's arguing the point about the word. "Lord." One more time: The Triune Godhead consists of Three distinct persons in ONE Being. The Father is not the Son or the Holy Spirit. The Son is not the Father or the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is not the Father or the Son. The Holy Spirit...

Sure. The Son is God Isaiah 7:14, Isaiah 9:6, Matt. 4:7, John 1:1, John 1:3, John 8:58, John 10:30, John 14:9, John 20:28, 2 Corinthians 4:4, Phil. 2:6, Col. 2:9, 1 Tim. 3:16, Heb. 1:8, Titus 2:13 The Son is a Man 1 Tim. 2:5, John 1:14, Mark 14:62, John 3:13, Luke 19:10, Matt. 8:20, Mark...

No - I call it opinion because you don't provide Scripture. When I provide Scripture - as I usually di - YOU call it "scattered verses" . . .

Not so fast. We will ALL die because that is wjat is requieed of us - and we don't have a chouce. Jesus didn't have to die - He CHOSE to die. He could have libed forever. Phil. 2:8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to death— even death on a cross...

Puttubg aside the pathetic arrogance - the ONLY thing you've shown to be an "expert" on is dogding challenges to provide actual Scriptural and histprcal dosumentatpn for your asiine claims. "Knowledgeable" in the ar of deflection and nothing else . . .

:D Mr. Kreeft is speaking at my church next month. Can't wait . . .

Good grief - another Alexander Hislop devotee . . . How many time must you be shown that Hislop simply made up most of what was in his book? Read Ralph Woodrow's "The Babylon Connection?", which dispels and otherwise debunks Hislop's schlock opus . . .

And that's your problem. You have an aversion to providing Biblical evidence. Pretty feeble for a Biblical "expert" . . .

This response is a textbook example of the utter ignorance of ex-Catholics. You don’t understand Scripture, Church history or what Catholics believe, so you leave – then deny the Church’s Apostolic roots. Shoe me a clueless Catholic and I’ll show you a Protestant . . . Ummmm, NOT sure what...

WRONG. There was only ONE Church. The Church was being called the Catholic Church before the end of the FIRST century while some of the Apostles were still alive. The distinction between "Catholic" and "Orthodox" didn't occur until the Schism in the 11th century. Eastern Fathers like first...

Again - YOU have presented nothing but your opinions. I have provided Scriptural quotes, references and context. In a debate - it's the weight of evidence that wins the day, NOT the lack of it . . .

And unless you;re just being dishonest - you apparently didn't read what I wrote about confession and penance. I state very clearly that the prayers or actions of penence take place AFTER repentance and forgiveness. And as I stated before - they are a tool to help the pernint person to reflect...

WRONG on BOTH counts. The blessing that the Pope has approved is not a blessing on the couple. It is a blessing on each individual - with a plea for them to returm to the fullness of the faith by eventually reoiuncing their lifestyle. Prayers or actions assigned as penance after confession...

Actually, a more accurate statement is that Gnostics hold to some Catholic teachings. Catholics were here first. There is some truth in just about every religious system - and that includes gnosticiam. That doesn't mean that those churches and faith traditions who share some of those truths...