Search results

You don't understand that Jesus explained this parable. Why are you going against what Jesus said, and giving us your own human opinion? Of course what happens on earth is like the kingdom in heaven. Jesus does the will of the Father, not His own path separate from God. Why do you deny...

How can that be the case? The heavenly kingdom of God was already established in Daniel 2 in Daniel's lifetime. The OT redeemed at the Cross were presented to God into that heavenly kingdom when they physically ascended on Sunday morning after Jesus told Mary that He was about to ascend to...

How can they be the kingdom of heaven, when they were not the church raptured at the Second Coming? Why would the church still be on the earth after the Second Coming? The kingdom of heaven is in heaven. That kingdom of heaven is where the majority of the church has been for 1994 years. The...

How can you be pre-mil, if you claim Matthew 13 was about the first century? The final harvest are those who inhabit the Millennial Kingdom on the earth. Jesus will sow the wheat after the Second Coming. Only those alive on the earth after the Second Coming can be considered either wheat or...

This parable is about the final harvest. Your interpretation is about an ongoing kingdom. That is my point. The final harvest is between the time the church was removed from the earth, and the 7th Trumpet. The Millennial Kingdom is the time frame after the 7th Trumpet. There is no...

Yet you seem to take ownership every time you respond to my post instead of a back and forth normal conversation. Your reply is on your own terms and conditions set up in your own imagination.

Since that kingdom is the entire creation, excluding the LOF, how is that possible that no offenders exist in creation? Not to mention even you say the kingdom was given to the church, which is not really what Jesus even said. The kingdom of heaven or God is still of heaven and not the...

So the Scripture in my post is just hallucinations to you? How are your private posts about "God's Supernatural Accomplishments", if you only see God’s Word as private hallucinations? You don't even have the decency to point out where God's Word has offended you.

The wheat is from Jesus being personally on the earth. The tares are people personally deceived by Satan. Do you deny the 3.5 year ministry of Jesus on the earth between His baptism and ascension into heaven? Or was that just theological imagination of some humans in the first century? Now...

I was not talking about Jesus. Are you saying Jesus was a sinner and needed the second birth? The OT redeemed came out of their graves in different bodies. That is how they could enter Paradise with Jesus. No one can enter heaven in Adam's flesh and blood. 2 Corinthians 5:1 "For we know...

I posted Scripture. Seems you prefer human knowledge over God's Word.

That is why at the Second Coming Jesus is on the earth. Matthew 13 is not about the Millennial Kingdom. "The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field:" Jesus never said the Kingdom of heaven was on the earth. What happens on the earth is like the kingdom...

Of course verse 24 is about the body. You are not your body. You are the soul. The soul is not placed in a grave. Those of the second birth have God's permanent incorruptible physical body in Paradise, when the soul puts on that body after leaving Adam's dead corruptible flesh on earth...

Matthew 13 concerning the final harvest is post the Second Coming. You are mixing up the kingdoms using Matthew 13. "He answered and said unto them, He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man; The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the...

Ok. The blind can keep leading the blind in that ditch of yours.

No, "we all" do not. Some call the trib the last 1994 years. Is that the post trib you refer to? Then yes, after the trib experienced by the church, the Second Coming will end that trib of those days, which was geat, over 1990+ years in duration. If that is not the trib, you are meaning...

Correct. They refer to what God had already established when Daniel was alive, not some future kingdom a thousand+ years later. Some have stated Revelation 20 ended when Jesus came the first time. Even Jesus in His parables explained that the heavenly kingdom had been around a long time...

That is your erroneous imagination, along with many early church fathers. Horns are not kingdoms. Horns are human individuals. Try to interpret Scripture correctly for a change. Daniel 7: "And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise." Daniel 8: "The great...

The point is not about the future. The point is being narrow minded about the past. The kingdom of heaven was set up and available since the Babylonian captivity. It will never go away until creation is no more. The kingdom of heaven will still be in heaven, and unnecessary on the earth...

Not Titus. His Father took over when 3 horns were plucked off in one year. Don't you accept that God placed the Ceasars of Rome, and took them away like Paul wrote? Romans 13:1-3 "Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are...