Search results

Oh gee. That was deep. Explain (Rom. 5:13-14). Stranger

In other words you ignore again. In other words, Scripture is against you. And you stick your ...head in the sand. Explain (Rom. 5:13-14). If Jesus is our Substitute, what does (Deut. 24:16) mean. It is you who want to say we die for our own sins, not Adams. So, explain. Stranger

So, was Noah saved when he started building the boat, or when he finished building the boat? Stranger

But their sin was not imputed to them. (Rom. 5:13) Stranger

No, you haven't explained. You have ignored it. Was Jesus our Substitute? If Jesus is our Substitute, what does (Deut. 24:16) mean? Explain (Rom. 5:13-14). Stranger

Whose sin killed them? Stranger

Yes, I know. But (Rom. 2:12) has nothing to do with imputation. And (Rom. 5:13-14) explains (Rom. 5:12). Which you ignore. No. There is plenty wrong in what you are saying. I am just pointing it out. You present (Deut. 24:16) to prove that imputation doesn't mean that man does not die...

Oh, I caught it. You reject the substitutionary death of Jesus Christ. Sorry to hear it, but I often suspected. Stranger

Scripture does interpret Scripture. (Romans 5:13-14) was given as an explanation of (Rom. 5:12). You, however, interpret (Rom. 5:12), and then say that discounts (13-14). (Rom. 5:12) " ...by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all...

NO!! The teaching of (Romans 5:13-14) is clear. They died because of Adams sin imputed to them. You deny the Scripture to uphold your legalistic doctrine. Again, take that lolipop out of your mouth and explain (Rom. 5:13-14). Your refusal to do say says all that needs to be said about...

OK. Stranger

I'm certainly not trying to ignore. Do you believe these men do not represent what Christ came to do? Or were you looking for information concerning them? Stranger

You mock and ignore the imputation of sin, and the blessedness of the man 'to whom the Lord will not impute sin'. Why? The Scripture is clear that God does not impute our sins to us. (Rom. 4:5-8) Your answers now are childish. No depth. yes, no, do not, do so etc. etc. They reflect your...

This is a very broad question. It requires me to know all the doctrine of these and other reformers. And I have not studied any one persons complete doctrine. The reformation in general reflects Christ mission in coming to earth. The insistence on Scripture alone. The insistence on...

Yes, and neither would I. Yes, always looking at Scripture. I agree, just because something is old doesn't mean it is wrong or in need of reforming. We always grow in knowledge which is governed by the Scripture. In our day, I am not surprised that you are drawn closer to the reformers...

No, Levi was not alive. He was not yet born. And after he was born, he never paid tithes to Melchisedec. Levi paid them only because Abraham paid them. Your refusal to admit this is based on your legalism. Yes, you are denying imputed righteousness. You must add your 'imparted...

Yes it is. But not just here. I find lately that it is everywhere. Just as I said, it is also with dispensationalism. I believe I have a working understanding of Calvinist doctrine. If you see where I misrepresent it, feel free to correct me. My own doctrine is in line with Calvinism...

What you are calling 'assumptions' many believe are Scriptural. So why is it an 'assumption'? Is it an assumption because you disagree with it? Do you believe that you do not have some 'presuppositions' when you come to the Bible to interpret? What are your presuppositions, or...

Myself I am not a thorough going Calvinist. But I do hold to much of Calvinist doctrine. I have nothing against Calvinism though I may disagree in certain areas. It seems only in the past few years that Calvinism has become a hated doctrine by many believers. Much like dispensational...

It is not a lie because God declared Levi paid though he never really paid. When Levi was alive, did he pay tithes to Melchisedec? No. He did so only in the act of another, not his act. Until you grasp the difference you will remain in your conceptual world. Note the reverse act of...