Search results

What does Paul say about the gays? "Receiving in themselves the penalty due their error" : isn't the presence of the penalty proof of the error? Also, if we know a choice leads to an undesirable outcome, but we make it anyway, because it has pleasure, doesn't that become the standard we live...

Lol I'm asking why it isn't mandatory

Also, I'm not sure grains and nuts were included.

Because Jesus uses the original pattern in Genesis as the standard for marriage, restoring it, and because "the lion will eat straw like the ox, a restoration of the lions' original diet, I'm asking why we wouldn't also be restored to our original diet. Something can be a holy command in one...

My question is why it isn't a universal law.

I'm not sure if it is a response to the OP, but I'm asking why restoration of the original diet (if Marriage is restored to the original, and the animals, themselves, will be restored to their original diet--if Messiah is a restorer of things to their original states) is optional. Agree

I dont understand what to do concerning (esp raw) veganism. On one hand, the Bible warns that in the last days, men, following demons' doctrines, will forbid eating foods God made to be enjoyed, and characterizes those who eat only vegetables as weak in the faith. On the other hand, the Bible...

There's nothing new to be said--all you've said is all you've already said, so all I've answered remains applicable. I'm not going to beat a dead horse.

It seems you're aiming to square 1 Jn 3:9 with 1 John 1:8. Again, 1 Jn 3:9 doesn't say Christians don't sin, and 1 Jn 2:1 says Christians have an Advocate with the Father in case they sin (meaning they sin) : your view of 1 Jn 3:9 is an abuse of the text. John already admitted Christians sin...

LOL You actually just quoted 1 john 3:9 to say exactly that didn't you? Don't you remember the conversation we are having? You said this: Then I said this : Then you said this : So, how aren't you denying that you sin? Actually, I knew you would raise 1 John 3:9, which was why I already...

Why do you say that? I read something that seems different in Scripture. 1 John 1:8 If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. 1 John 2:1 ...I am writing these things to you so that you will not sin. But if anyone does sin, we have an advocate before the...

What did Jesus want His Apostles to teach the world?

Repeating the same falsified idea isn’t going to make it true. Answer to the answer I already provided you. That's how a discussion works--we progress through it by answering successive challenges to our views, gettingthroughthe outer layers to the core so we can see whether its true or false.

You already acknowledged my point from Mt 18 was a fatal issue to your empty view, BUT you tried to rescue your empty view by saying it is irrelevant now. I showed that it's still relevant, because Jesus said go teach others what I taught you. Also, you claimed we weren't servants, but Sons...

An empty assertion--1 Cor 10 demonstrates my point. He says these things happened to them, and they were written down for us teach us not to do as they did because we know what God will do to us based on how He dealt with them How can you "help" anyone when you're completely unacquainted with...

Irrelevant : the things that happened to them happened to them to teach us about how God relates to His people. If not, then reprimand Paul for starting a "cult", since he taught about how God relates to His people in the NT using OT (1 Corinthians 10). The unforgiving servant (Mt 18)...

Deuteronomy 32:5 denies this. Also, Matthew 18, which shows the forgiveness that has already had its effect can also be rescinded so that its effect is reversed, so that the one who had previously received forgiveness now has to pay for his sins just as any other unbeliever.

The devil knows the Bible, too--he knows how to twist it--that's how!

Well, bottom line is it was only found among the Gnostics... ?

No, I don't observe Sabbath, and Ro 14 tells me that's perfectly fine.