Search results

According to YOUR interpretation..........

QUOTES (plural) FROM YOU: Again, we are discussing John 6. But I am focusing on John 6 here.. can you do this. Can we please stick to what jesus said in John 6. Again, Do not go to another passage to explain this.. But lets first discuss John 6

Nope EG, I never said that. Here is what YOU said: POST #238: I opened this thread to show that John 6 is not so hard to understand that we do not need to have teachers explain it to us. That we can understand ourselves. If we just listen.

Nope EG, I believe I made it very clear what I was saying. I NEVER said the bible was not written for us in the 21st century. YOU added that to what I said. :watching and waiting: FACT: 1 John is a letter to the Churches in the time he wrote them. So YOU, in 1 John, are the Churches in the 1st...

QUOTES (plural) FROM YOU: Again, we are discussing John 6. But I am focusing on John 6 here.. can you do this. Can we please stick to what jesus said in John 6. Again, Do not go to another passage to explain this.. But lets first discuss John 6 CC: @Nancy

No, I do not think God is a man and had sex with Mary. It's obvious you can't see that I am portraying what your Protestant men have taught YOU, not telling you what I believe. I can see that you are unable to grasp this conversation AND you are a very condescending person. Mary

In john 6 Jesus told his disciples that we must eat Him. However, he had yet to show them how to eat him. He did this at the Last Supper. Paul then re-affirmed what Jesus said about the last supper. to be continued...the plot thickens.

No problem. It is getting close to dinner time and I work this weekend so I won't get back to you until monday. Yes, ALL of Scripture includes OT and NT. I will use both to talke about the Bread Jesus spoke of in John 6.....

Thank you. Much better than my conversation with EG. When Scripture mentions bread we can not and should not look at that one passage and try to figure out what it means. It has to be taken into context of ALL of Scripture. Does that make sense? Do you disagree with that use of hermenutics? Mary

Very good question. Thank you. Some of it may be relevant today, but that would have to be looked at vs by vs.

I would like to discuss the purpose of this thread: John 6 and the bread from heaven! No restrictions like EG put on me. What does the bible say about BREAD!

I don't have anything to forgive you for execpt your conflating of 2 different conversations.....but we shall carry on.

FACT: 1 John is a letter to the Churches in the time he wrote them. So YOU are the Churches in the 1st century. They were having a problem with heretical teachings.

NO, going from John 6 to the Holy Spirit doing the interpreting of Scripture is what YOU interjected into the conversation. Remember when I called you a troll and posting irrelevant stuff?

Hey Ziggy....Anything I say is not personal...It's just passion. Respectfully, Mary Wait a minute....Exactly WHAT are you forgiving me for? :contemplate:

True....

Thank you, Nancy. I will not call anyone a liar again. I understand how that can be offensive even when the evidence is clear. I didn't mean it to be offensive. I will soften my words. Respectfully, Mary

How can round one be over if neither you or I forfeited? That makes no sense....Let's move on.

Ummmm....you should just read IN CONTEXT instead of cherry picking. But i am ready to move on.....

Round 1 was about your defense of EG (by using a passage from Scripture) saying that any man can read Scripture and understand without the help of a teacher if they just listen. I showed you that the passage you used to defend that theory DOES NOT support that theory. That passage YOU used is...