Search results

Thank you for proving my point.

Nope, we are not discussing bread. We are discussing your defense of the statement that EG made that any man can read John 6 without a teacher to teach them if they just listen. Last chance....Stay on task or we are done. If you want to change the subject to bread let me know.

Not relevant Ziggy....we are discussing men interpreting Scripture on their own with no teacher involved. Get focused man....

A random passage from John 14 does not support a passage from 1 John 2. Twist it all you want....there is NO connection. When you twist Scripture you bring destruction upon yourself. No man cometh unto the father but by me has NOTHING to do with men reading Scripture on their own and being able...

Who are the "little children" that John is talking about Ziggy? They are the ones that heard from the beginning (vs 24). Who are the little children that heard from the beginning Ziggy? Not you, 2,000 years later. Not your Protestant fathers who read those words 1,600 years later. Those...

Where does John tell us that? Curious Mary

Got it. You are not objective. Condescending, YES! Objective? No!

How about those posts where EG lied? Can you find those? Do you want to find those? You found the posts where I called EG a liar and suggested that doing that this conversation is personal and unworthy of continuing. Are you taking sides? Or are you going to look at this objectively? Curious Mary

If I was to say right now "I never called EG a liar" you could quote my posts where I in fact did call EG a liar. I can prove my case against EG. Is it personal when someone lies OR is it personal when someone calls out a lie? Is this thread only unworthy of continuing because I saw something...

That makes ZERO sense..... Jesus taught the Apostles the Truth. Plain and simple. Why would you twist that FACT? Keeping it real with the Truth....Mary

That passage is to the men who have been taught by HIM. That passage means no man can teach THEM because they are, by His anointing, the teachers of other men. Like I said: Jesus taught the Apostles. The Apostles then taught other men. Those men then taught other ment etc etc. That passage...

If I have done that please let me know which post(s) it was so I can clarify, apologize or prove my case. Respectfully, Mary

You are killing me EG....Just killing me. The more I read what you write I get more and more concerned for you. Scripture does not support your theory that any man can read Scripture and understand it for themselves if they just listen!! Scripture says opposite of that. What you have written is...

When you want to start fresh....let me know.

I know....

If you want to start fresh, WITHOUT your derogatory remarks about me and my Church....let me know.

Hey trollman, Do you have ANYTHING to say that is relevent?

LIAR..... YOU are the one who limited us to John 6.....STOP LIEING!!! I even playfully apologized when I referenced other books from Scripture because you TOLD ME I COULDN"T.....So PLEASE stop!

Liar....YOU restricted our conversation to John 6. YOU then decided to expand your "proof" to all the book of John. Therefor you did not search all of Scripture AND you restricted me to YOUR cherry picking rules. If you had searched all of Scripture and compared it to what Jesus and the...

I can't do this with you anymore EG..... I am not focused on "eat my flesh and drink my blood". That is a lie. You are a liar. YOU are focused on a few passages in John 6. I, Marymog, am focused on the entire word of God. The entire word of God, not cherry-picked passages, completely destroys...