Search results

That's a very sad and incorrect motivation for obeying the gospel. Obey out of fear? That completely destroys the real reason God desires our company. Love.

We still haven't figured out who God is, let alone who we are.

Satan tempted no-one to eat of the tree of life. I don't care what Jewish rabbis taught. They taught Jesus had a demon and was worthy of crucifixion. I don't recognise their authority.

Agree. That selfishness is what we inherit from our forebears, and it is that selfishness that motivates our sinfulness. Otherwise known as our carnal nature, or flesh. Jesus was born with the nature of His forebears. He proved however throughout His life that such a nature inherited from His...

Eve did not eat of the tree of life. There were two trees in the garden. Eve ate of that tree which was forbidden... The tree of Knowledge. And if she had eaten of the tree of life after sinning, she, and us, would have become immortal sinners. Thankfully God set angels to guard the tree of life...

With every change in government in the US over the last 100 years or so, the pendulum swings between left and right have increased with each change... With each crisis of management...with each exaggerated election promise. And it's the ordinary people who are left to pick up the pieces. Of...

Bro, seriously. Since when have I ever disagreed with you, called you out, despised you, or refrained my own lips from speaking the truth regarding the CC as the true Antichrist of scripture?

It is age old conundrum. Are we sinners because we sin...or do we sin because we're sinners?

I agree with you here. This is a version of original sin. We are not condemned for the sins of our fathers, although the hereditary effects of those sins do impact our lives...eg alcoholism and drug addiction have hereditary impact on offspring for several generations, although in God's mercy...

I agree. If the price was paid for our redemption, and it was, “In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace; ” Ephesians 1:7 KJV Unfeigned Bible, then like the slaves of 19th century America, although they could legally walk free...

They also helped build Washington and London. And in the following telling picture, I don't see Jerusalem... So who do you think is really in charge? The Rothschilds? Or the institution that has all their incredible wealth deposited with them?

Impossible. “And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease... ” Daniel 9:27 KJV https://www.unfeignedbible.app/Daniel.9.27 The spiritual efficacy of the sacrifices ceased in 31ad with the events that...

The 10 kings were to reign contemporaneously. 3 of them were to be plucked up before, or in front of, and by doing so made way for complete authority over what turned out to be almost all churches in western Europe, making them Catholic. Antiochus Epiphanes was a nobody, defeated and caused to...

Let me in detail give my reasons why I believe Antiochus cannot be the little horn of Daniel 7. a. Antiochus does not rise after 10 kings. He was the 8th king in the Syrian line of Seleucid kings. Besides, the prophecy calls for 10 kingdoms to exist contemporaneously, not successively. b...

I have gone back and read a few of your previous posts in other threads. You have an expectation that everyone has a second chance to choose Christ. I cannot remember which sect in particular teaches this, either LDS or JWs. I think. Scripture does not teach any kind of scenario where those who...

Jesus was explaining His authority. He had authority to speak in the name of His Father because He came forth from the Father and was sent by Him. The miracles attest to this. This was another way of saying, God sent His only begotten Son. I know summer cavil at the term only begotten, and say...

Agree. Although there's an appropriate discussion to be had around Michael. Archangel, literally head off the angels, doesn't necessarily mean He is also a created angel. Lord of hosts, speaking of the Son of God, can be readily understood as being archangel.

Jesus was not a messenger?

Okay.

My mistake. I seem to remember universalist ideas on previous posts of yours. I must be confused with someone else. Apologies.