Search results

(Acts 9:31) does not use the word 'catholic'. You can spit and moan all you want, it is not there. "Then had the churches rest throughout all Judaea and Galilee and Samaria...." That it is talking about all the churches, yes. That they represented the universal Church, yes. But the word...

Well, isn't this interesting. You say there are three major groups of 'Rites'. Roman. Antiochian. Alexandrian. Yet your opening statement is "I happen to practice the Latin Rite. BreadOfLife will love this. Stranger

Ah yes, kiss the masters feet. or, kiss whatever. You Romanists love to kiss each other's... Stranger

Sorry, I showed already that 'none' of them illustrate oral tradition. You need more blue words and shout louder, and more bs on it. Stranger

No. You didn't. You twisted words and Scripture to sooth your conscience that the word 'catholic' is there. But it isn't. Where's the blue large words? Shout louder and throw more bs on it. Perhaps many will be convinced. But both you and I know you are lying. Stranger

How? Stranger

And? Stranger

Again, the word 'catholic' isn't in the Bible. Shout a little louder. Throw a little more bs on it. It still isn't there. Stranger

I've already answered these. Go back and reread. I'm not desperate. You're the one shouting from the roof tops. You don't fool anyone. We learned a long time ago, the one who beats the pulpit the hardest is the one who doesn't know what he is talking about. You have nothing. Stranger

Scripture alone fails nothing. Thanks I will. Quantrill

Pay attention. (1 Cor. 11:23) "For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you...." That is revelation sweetheart. Not tradition. Stranger

I agree, Romanists have their own theology. But, once you argue with them you will see they will deny their own theology. They acknowledge the Pope as all powerful over the Roman Church, what they call the Catholic Church. Yet they deny that they are Roman even though they submit and answer...

Oh please Mary. What kind of silly question is that? You go ahead and keep quoting and changing Scripture and I will point it out to you when I see you are amiss. One thing is for sure. Your tradition isn't Scripture. How's that? That should clear up alot. Stranger

I explained it already in post #(1229). Paul received his gospel from Jesus Christ. (Gal. 1:11) Paul says in (1 Cor. 15:1) "...I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand." See also (1 Cor. 11:23) "For I have received of the...

So what? Sacrifices pre-dated Israel. Prayer pre-dated Israel. Stranger

Again, nothing in the Bible says the Roman Pontiff is shephard of the Catholic Church. The word 'catholic' isn't even in the Bible. Try again. Stranger

(Matt. 2:23) is not oral tradition. It says 'spoken by the prophets'. It is not a quote. Nazareth was in Galilee. Galilee was known as Galilee of the Gentiles, (Is. 9:1), which the Jews despised. Thus Nathaniel's statement in (John 1:46) "...Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth?"...

Post #(47). You stated they did not originate with God. You trivialize the act. Now you say you don't reject it. If it is of God then why do you come against it? If churches practice it, why speak ill of it? No, your crawfishing now. Stranger

Well, your opinion is muslim. Gee, what a help that will be. Stranger

My complaint is they are muslim. Haven't I made that clear. Of course clear to you is a river after a flood. Stranger