Search results

Scriptures are not the product of 'tradition'. They are the product of 'revelation'. This is why Jesus said, 'It is written'. Scriptures are what carry the weight. Stranger

No, I don't use it in a derogatory sense. What is derogatory is the attempt for you and others to separate yourself from the Roman Church in the attempt to solidify your rule over the Catholic Church of Christ. Stranger

So glad to hear it Mary. When will you start. (1 Cor. 15:1-8) is not 'Tradition'. That Paul received it doesn't mean it came from tradition. Paul spoke to the resurrected Christ. (Gal. 1:12) For, (1 Cor. 11:23-26) the same is true. Concerning (Rom. 8:15-17) and (Gal. 4:6-7), you use...

Sorry Einstein, what Paul received had never before been revealed. (Eph. 3:2-5) "It is written" proves the importance of Scripture alone. Jesus who was the Son, didn't have to use it all. But He did. Nice try wordsmith. (2 Thess. 2:14) disproves your argument with (2 Thess. 2:15)...

There is nothing in the Bible that says the Roman Pontiff is shepherd of the Catholic Church. You're constant play with words is nothing short of lying. If you submit to the Pontiff of Rome, and the Roman Pontiff has all authority over the Church, then you are part of the Roman Church...

Laying on of hands is Biblical. Why do you reject it? Stranger

Your parallels are lame. Again, as I have said many times, we are not talking about cities. We are talking about the 'Roman Church'. The Roman Pontiff rules over the Roman Church. You answer to the Roman Pontiff. That makes you part of the Roman Church. Take it up with Vatican II as I...

Paul spoke and wrote by revelation. He did not speak and write by 'tradition'. Go back and read post #(1201). The tradition Paul speaks of in (2 Thess. 2:15) is that which was given him by revelation from Jesus Christ. (2 Thess. 2:14) (Gal. 1:11) "It is written" (Matt. 4:4,7,10)...

Yes, if I lived under those laws, I would accept the law of God. Now, would you? Stranger

...but you're a muslim. Stranger

Good, because I don't believe you. Laying on of hands was done by the apostle's and early church. It is Biblical. Do you disbelieve God? Who cares? There were believers around long before Israel. Stranger

Go back and read your post's. Then if you are blind to it, I will tell you. Stranger

The Lord's Supper is an ancient custom. Faith in God and Jesus Christ is an ancient custom. We get these from the ancient Book, The Bible. Why should I believe you of this miraculous healing of you and your friend all by yourself's? Stranger

No, I have an idea why you don't argue. Because you have nothing to say. And if you have nothing to say, then just stay away. Stranger

Who asked you anyway? You want to throw your opinion out there but reject any one's else opinion. Stranger

So? I am OK with whatever God says to those He says it to. Stranger

As I said, in (Deut. 22:28) I am not convinced it is rape. "and they be found" Irregardless of what you think about it, it is the way God instituted it. And I guarantee you it would have worked. Your 'morals' don't really matter. Stranger

The man who raped the woman was in (Deut. 22:25). And he would be put to death. Is that all right with you? Well, in many cultures the woman doesn't have the choice. So what? You think God does everything to please the American way? Stranger

Nice speech. Little substance. Paul did not speak by tradition. He spoke by revelation. As I said, big difference. Stranger

Read again post # (1083). I know... you are playing word games again. You say, the 'official' titles of the pope are, etc. etc. Was the Vatican II gathering, unofficial? It states very clearly, "...the Roman Pontiff has full, supreme, and universal power over the Chruch." (The Documents...