Search results

Constant projection, it is with you! You make a blatant Appeal to Authority. Going to the source material, In no sense of the word “son” is “God” a valid sense of the word.

I already provide source material showing you are factually wrong on the proper translation of John 1:18. You are the one who refuses to see for yourself.

Nope. Sorry. Can't feed your relying into bad translations. From Examining the Textual Variant in John 1:18 | Ezra Institute The older English rendering, “only-begotten Son,” is common and appears elsewhere in John.

The indoctrination of the student was obvious. Attempting to diminish the issue, he asked Robinson if he’d CARE (and be here) if the women were raped by a native? Notice the Appeal to emotion? Notive the ignorance of previous US Presidents deporting millions; how Trump is NOT a racist anomaly...

In NO WAY does your reference claim anyone other than the Father is God - unless you rely on such horrible translations. Compare to most other translations. No one has ever seen God; the only begotten Son, who is in a most intimate relationship witha the Father, he has explained him.

A coworker has a bumper sticker that answers this question. It reads, "A socialist is a person too dumb to realize they are a communist."

The Left is so lost! Whoever is the supposed 'oppressed' group in their Cultural Marxist ideology can do any evil with impunity. Where are those on the Left condemning this fraud? The shield of 'racism' - not the blood of Christ - covers all sin.

Again, you just assert stuff. @Beebster observed the Bible has many analogies. You are very hostile to the wisdom of the Bible and the theology it contains. VERY hostile (removed). Sticking to the Bible is what you DO NOT DO. The Bible identifies only the father as God - in every Epistle! Jesus...

A confession destroying the trinity. Thanks for your honesty.

No. I deny the claim that ‘supports’ is not the same as an actual explicit teaching.

so true. Seems futile. <sigh>

You keep saying this but do not show how it is true. So, I will peat what I said. You are the one making the category error.

Discuss each point as it applies to the pros and cons of each argument, silly.

No, you didn’t address one that I mocked; you ignored the specifics to just re-iterate a general conclusion.

Except for the 3 part.

Address the points one at a time.

LOL Project again! Pretend "it all" supports your doctrine while glossing over the actual teaching of the Bible.

Proof you've lost the argument; having to resort to personal attacks.

'Father ... the only true God.' Jesus

It’s not surprising the advocates of 3-is-1 just ignore the points in this thread. It’s been at least 15 minutes since I posted this. LOL