Search results

What is the explanation for how the believer is "condemned" if he sins (Romans 14:23) if there's "no condemnation" for those "in Christ" (Ro 8:1)? How do you reconcile the two realities?

Read the title of this thread. Does it read, "Is GracePeace Born Again?"?

What is the explanation for how the believer is "condemned" if he sins (Romans 14:23) if there's "no condemnation" for those "in Christ" (Ro 8:1)? How do you reconcile the two realities? I erased that debunking of your assertion because I didn't want to let you take things off topic.

Here is the topic with which you may engage: 1. Remaining "in Christ" is by keeping God's Commands: a) believe, b) love (Jn 15:3-10 ; 1 Jn 3:23,24). 2. The spiritually immature, the children, are warned to "remain in Christ" (1 Jn 2:28). 3. Romans 8:1 says "in Christ" there is "no...

You are not welcome to flood my thread with irrelevant noise. Here is the topic with which you may engage: 1. Remaining "in Christ" is by keeping God's Commands: a) believe, b) love (Jn 15:3-10 ; 1 Jn 3:23,24). 2. The spiritually immature, the children, are warned to "remain in Christ" (1 Jn...

If you want to engage me in my thread, please be on topic: Here is the topic with which you may engage: 1. Remaining "in Christ" is by keeping God's Commands: a) believe, b) love (Jn 15:3-10 ; 1 Jn 3:23,24). 2. The spiritually immature, the children, are warned to "remain in Christ" (1 Jn...

It's not relevant to this discussion. Please stop flooding my thread with your irrelevant off topic discussion.

You have not asked a single question relevant to the topic I raised; you are raising a tangential that is your perennial topic you want to raise. Whether someone is a child of God or not has no bearing on whether Romans 14:23 condemns a believer who does not walk in faith, and whether that...

There is nothing else to speak about--either you make a coherent argument, or you have nothing to add to the conversation. You are dragging things off topic.

The Spirit of Truth permits people to have lop-sided theology, because He backs whoever speaks truth, to what ever degree they speak it--that DOES NOT mean that He is backing EVERYTHING you speak, only the parts of it that are true. I aim to combine the Word of the Spirit together with the...

Exactly. I acknowledge people can know God, and derive benefit by having a lop-sided theology, but I went to hell from listening to a preacher instead of God, so I will NEVER listen to a man, I will only listen to the Bible, and NEVER hold to incoherence no matter what it can grant me.

Paul calls the Law of Moses "the Law of my mind" to open the door to his later argument, "each man must be fully convinced in his own mind". This is also how the Gentile believers can be deemed "doers of the Law" without even knowing the Law (Ro 2:14): the New Covenant involves God writing His...

No, actually, this entire time I've remained absolutely dumbfounded at how any sane mind could actually entertain the incoherent bankrupt illogic you have been expressing here. Actually, I had already given you much information along those lines--you could easily have replied to that information.

And the thread, I think, proves not all remain, since "no condemnation in Christ" (Ro 8:1), but the believer who sins is "condemned" (Ro 14:23), since remaining in Him is by keeping both His Word (faith), and Works (love = walk in faith) (Jn 15; 1 Jn 3:23,24).

Your suppression of the obvious truth--which everyone, even those on your side (OSAS), agree on, yet you claim there is a "conspiracy", including by your own OSAS people, to suppress your view--is insulting. "Can't make a good argument"? LOL Your objections have done nothing but honed my...

Acting on the faith is the "gift". Our acts of faith are Christ's acts, not our works which would pertain to our own righteousness--walking in faith is God's righteousness (Ro 1:17). Therefore, on the Day of Judgment, those who are doers of the Law are justified as a gift by walking in...

Yeah, I agree, I just needed more of an answer, because there are so many other truths in Scripture that require answering.

Walking by faith is not "works". "Works" is "a righteousness of my own"; walking in faith is God's righteousness (Ro 1:17; 14:5,23). "I was abundant in labors above them all, yet, not I, but the grace with me." "I have been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives...

For anyone who has been confused by the "not saved by works" argument (as I had been): When we walk in faith, that is Christ saving us apart from works of the Law, saving us (1 Co 15:2) with His righteousness, bc when we walk in grace through faith, that is the "gift of righteousness" (that...

Based on how uninformed and dishonest you are just in Romans, I wouldn't think I'd want to exert my effort wrangling with you through all of Paul's epistles, where you'd have to be corrected on so many more issues, and wouldn't care to accept the correction--except if I thought I wanted the...