Search results

No! Everyone of church-ianity is promoting the LIE, that there will be to come a fictitious, one man wonder, that THEY call "THE Antichrist". In the KJV, one will NOT find the words: "The Antichrist". However, there is "THAT spirit of antichrist", and therefore infects MANY to be antichrists.

You have interpreted that backwards. The born again saints are taken first to be with the Lord. All others who are left behind are burned up and destroyed! Here is the full description of that which is "church-ianity", as opposed to "Christianity", being ALL who ARE born again by the "power"...

"Just the facts man." KJV Luke 17:28-30 [28] Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded; [29] But the SAME day that Lot WENT out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them ALL. [30] EVEN...

The books of 1&2 Maccabees provide the historical Jewish account of the details that you have assembled. You are close enough to get to the point, of who exactly it WAS, that WAS the "little horn" of the 3rd beast, of Daniel, "in the latter time of their kingdom" of the Grecian Empire. In...

As for the "Immaculate Conception" of Mary, I take no committed stand for or against it, except to say that Jesus IS ETERNAL, and therefore of Himself in that state of being, before His incarnation, He was always Eternal Spirit with the Father. Of course Jesus was born without sin, and never did...

In the context of all the epistles of John, that speak of "that [singular] spirit of antichrist", 1 John 2:22 lists the conclusion before the description of how to identify that spirit of antichrist, thus revealing that all of such are liars. As a result, in Romans, we discover that the Holy...

No matter what you manipulate and change in your point of view, of how "that spirit of antichrist" is manifested, the RCC does not deny the Father and/or the Son, and does confess that Jesus is come in the flesh. Whatever doctrine it is, that has led you astray into believing such a falsehood...

There is ONLY one definition of antichrist, and that is "THAT spirit of antichrist" that infects "MANY".

According to 2 John 1:7, the RCC professes the fact that Jesus Christ who is eternal and perfect, came from God the Father's eternity ["from above"] to dwell among us in the flesh, being Himself the perfect sacrificial Lamb of God". Therefore, the RCC is not "of that spirit of antichrist". KJV...

According to 2 John 1:7, the RCC professes the fact that Jesus Christ who is eternal, came from that eternity ["from above"] to dwell among us in the flesh, being the sacrificial "Lamb of God". Therefore, the RCC is not "of that spirit of antichrist".

It appears that most professing christians do understand the history of the 10 horns, as being Europe. Others see the 10 horns as being a "confederation of 10 countries" in the Mid-east. As for me, I don't see the 10 horns as the focus of concern. In the end of time, they are basically 10...

The "doctrine of the immaculate conception", is nothing more than a religious view, by a form of church-ianity, as is the doctrine of a future "1000 year reign of Christ on earth", nothing more than a religious view, by a form of church-ianity. If both do not deny that "Jesus Christ is come in...

First and foremost, let's get this straight: the whore is NOT the 10 horn beast, nor is the 10 horn beast the whore. So then, whatever you think the Sea beast is, IT IS ALSO NOT Europe. However, the 10 horn beast does "carry" the whore, which reveals that it is the beast that is in control of...

Hmmm....so now I present the "template" that matters, in post #394, and now suddenly you are ready to bow out of the discussion. Why? Because, you would have to admit that the RCC and the Papacy ARE NOT "of that spirit of antichrist".

Correct! So then according to you, how does the RCC Papacy measure up to that template of 1 John 4:2-3 and 2 John 1:7? If you look in my recent past posts, I agreed with all of that history, except your view about who the ten horns were, and that the papacy is antichrist. Granted, the ten...

Well, since you are determined to throw templates around, let's get to the one that matters. So, instead of me trying to prove from out of the ancient past about who the "little horn" was, I am going to point to God's template, that is present in the world today, and then allow you to tell me...

Again, the words: "The Antichrist" do not appear in the KJV. Your "template" is gone awry with the ten horns/toes. All they are or ever will be, are 10 future European countries that get appointed [crowned] "for one hour" by the Sea beast, to make war (Armageddon) against the Lamb, upon His...

The "little horn" rose out of the 3rd beast, NOT the 4th beast, and is historically known as Antiochus Epiphanes lV. Most all of "church-ianity" has misconstrued that one simple fact from Daniel, and are all off on a religious tangent of science fiction. Except for your mentioning, of the legs...

(An edit of item #12 for my post #385*): "Yes, I agree. But ever since 70AD, the future of "the beast with 10 horns" has been EVOLVING, down through years, as shown in king Neb's dream of the image/statue". *Edit: We can see that prophetic "evolving" taking place in Rev. 13:1-10. The correct...

Dan. 7[6] After this I beheld, and lo another [3rd beast], like a leopard, which had upon the back of it four wings of a fowl; the [3rd] beast had also four HEADS; and dominion was given to it. Stop refusing the Jewish historical account of 1 and 2 Maccabees, of which is the desolation and...