Search results

In your first example you are confusing giving with taxes, which is very sad to see. In your second example you miss a very simple point. Its simply unbiblical and large companies tend to set up shop elsewhere.

Thats not what i said

Yea... Their tax philosophy. Tax the rich more than the poor and give it to the poor (taking a cut for yourself). Totally unbiblical and sovialist in nature. Wrlfare. Unemployment. Yes i support them too and so do repubs. But only out of fear. They are both concepts in the bible, but...

Actually I do. You believe in grace through faith as long as you stop sinning or try to stop sinning. Thats bullspit. You also believe that one must prove their faith by works. Thats also bullspit. The closest THAT is to truth is that both Paul and James agree its only proof in the eyes...

Don't change the subject, just answer the charges! 1. H. Never said that. 2. Your posts continually prove you believe in grace only if you stop sinning. 3. New charge: your view on OSAS is totally ignorant of what Calvin taught. 4. New Charge: free will is not in the Bible. Paul...

H. Richard never said that. You totally miss his point. And your post proves it. You said that Jesus said, "keep my commandments". Problem is you aren't keeoing them, but you disagree with him? So you are actually keeping Jesus's commandments? You aren't. Unless you do it by faith...

No Dcopymope. It doesn't do anything you said. You have no scripture that says otherwise. But you and Wormwood win. Goodbye.

I actually wonder if Catholics will make it into heaven. Tick. Tock.

I actually wonder if Catholics will make it into heaven. Tick. Tock.

The inquisition. Catholics killed a lot of people. Thw counter inquisition. The daughters of the Whore killed a lot of people. There is a mass grave of Catholics 90 miles from me. Tick Tock

Tick. Tock.

Well, let me break it down for you. The democratic party is about communism and socialism. The rebublican party is about freedom of trade and liberty. Oh sure. It goes deeper than that. Peter actually instigated a communist chutch. And it worked well on a small scale. Oh wait... It...

It is with bitersweet joy that I read these words: No, H. Richard's response wasn't that. Never saw him say that and if he did... Let me know... I will correct him. But what I do sre is you drawing boxes around certain scripture and not regarding the whole of the letter. No need to...

I'll mull on that for a while... But on the surface it does seem to make sense.

28 June, 2016. "Those who are "under grace" will not live in sin, but offer their bodies to God's service. Those who think grace has nothing to do with how you live or even that grace is a license to sin...will be condemned." You said that. You said a lot of other things on that day that...

Its alright. I get passionate as well.

I have no idea what a royal child is, or where "over here" is. I don't have children so I don't even know how much diapers cost. I don't have to try to live on such or such salarly.... While I haven't been on welfare i have been on unemployment. I never said i have a solution to the problem...

Well, first of all, Acts 2:44 has nothing to do with the question. It wasn't noted as a welfare situation. Second, I am not against welfare or social programs. Plenty of verses support it. I will be happy to list them, but I will also note that a man who doesn't provide for his house denies...

Well, history certainly has alot to say about that.

I like the bit about the tax collector. The Bibles says God was repented for making man.... But he didn't stop making them either! To say repentance is constant is slightly different from my take. It seems to me it is utterly senseless to try to repent from all your sins. You've got to...