Search results

If only there was a way to differentiate rhetorical questions designed to produce doubt in God, and the Scriptures he inspired, from sincerely wanting more knowledge and understanding.

This is one of the best posts I've ever read from you. On topic! Good job.

Hmm. Bad premise on top of bad premise. Perhaps he was baptized because he needed to be. The whole "need" analysis is a distraction from that he was changed, which is not a quality of the unchanging God of Scripture.

Agreed. This is the line of demarcation. Trinitarians wand to limit what it means to be a Christian to equal being a trinitarian. They call it orthodoxy. I follow the plan text of Scripture, not what trinitarians tell me how I should interpret it 4 centuries later. The title of this thread...

Exactly! John states his purpose at 20:31 is for us to know Jesus is the Christ. Not God incarnate. Read that. Stop extreme eisegesis for prologue to mean other than what John stated his purpose to be.

False. I already explained this. Dig into the actual words, you will find God said he is eternal, cumbersomely expressed as more than “I am” but “I was, am and am becoming.” Everyone says I am. Doesn’t mean they are God OR are claiming to be God.

Not even God can raise himself from the dead. This is because God cannot die. Scripture does not say that Christ raised himself but that God raised him. Romans 10:9.

Lots of humility in that post.

Odd mystical separation of the person who was born 2,000 years ago (capitalization not required as ‘person’ is a common noun). Each Gospel emphatically proclaims who this person is, God’s anointed. Nothing more. Nothing less. And this person has a name that is not the name of the one true God...

Primarily because you are nothing special, though you pretend to be; the path to salvation is the same for all - including you. Simple.

And a point of linguistics. Who perfected Jesus through suffering? God - in his unitarian nature - did the acting as the subject of the sentence. Jesus was acted upon, the object of the sentence. We find this arrangement throughout the NT. God - in his unitarian nature - gave to the world he...

Well, obviously, I’m an interfaith devotee.

This verse shows Jesus is NOT the unchanging God of Scripture. Why else would Jesus need perfecting through suffering?

1st, one has to have eyes to see the conspiracy in Biblegateway of capital-LORD pasting as lowercase-Lord. Then one has to have the curiosity of why that text change would be happening? I even contacted Biblegateway with numerous examples. No response.

That’s what you got out of my post? Bless your heart.

I am fully capable of presenting a new and different point, tangentially related to conspiracy of text manipulation. Thanks. Care to address the substance of my post?

I’m glad you brought up this conspiracy because everyone should be aware of the ongoing conspiracy at Biblegateway where they deliberately conflate capital-LORD with lowercase-Lord when copying and pasting the text. Consider Psalm 110:1 (NLT) The Lord said to my Lord It should read The LORD...

Absurd. This is not the actions or motivations of a witness FOR God. Rather, the constant slander is an accusation AGAINST God. Very sad.

As Pope John Paul II said in 1999, the West had embraced a culture of death. Sad. Stupid. Predictable.

Nice to meet you. Rarely do I find a trinitarian who concedes any rationalization for their dogma. Do you subscribe to the thesis of the OP, that only if a person embraces the trinity can they be allowed to call themselves Christian? Explicit proof? It's important to point out that the claim...