Search results

Would you agree that it was the will of God that everyone everywhere keep the commandments which existed before Sinai and did not begin at Sinai but were merely codified at Sinai? If so, why should we conclude that God is only interested that Jews be obedient but the rest of us can do what we...

I can slice and dice and pick apart Jesuit Futurism and Jesuit Preterism, but you can't find a single inconsistency with Protestant Historicism. Step up to the challenge.

Impossible. "Messiah the Prince" was "cut off but not for Himself" on Calvary's Cross "after" the 69th Week which means "during" the 70th Week almost 2,000 years ago when He died for the sins of the world - are you saying Jesus didn't die for our sins yet? Jesuit Futurism teaches Antichrist's...

When you acknowledge Hebrews 4:9 in the Peshitta says it's our Christian duty to keep the Sabbath, I'll continue our debate, otherwise I'm done.

Only those who "keep the commandments of God (which includes the Sabbath Jesus spoke at Sinai) go to heaven (Revelation 22:14 KJV) Sorry, memorials serve to bring remembrance of things that are past. God made the 7th day Sabbath because He rested from all His works which He created and made...

If the Ten Commandments Jesus spoke at Sinai aren't the "law of Christ", who's flippin laws are they? Satan's? The Michelin Man's?

I've been watching for you to explain where all these are found written anywhere by anyone before the Jesuits authored them during the mid-16th century: a 2000+ year "gap" between the 69th and 70th Week??? the "last seven years of tribulation"??? a "7 year peace treaty between the Arabs and...

Not only do you follow Jesuit Futurism, but you defend Papal eschatological bulldookey so vehemently that Rome is likely to call you any day now to see if you're on their payroll.

Stop running away from the question and step up to the challenge.' You assert that Jesuit Futurism pre-dates the mid-16th century Jesuits and goes all the way back to the 3rd century. Defend your assertions: Where's Iranaeus' or any other church father's documentation about: a 2000+ year...

I keep answering your ridiculous arguments with solid exegesis such as the Ten Commandments existed before Sinail, including the Sabbath, but you refuse to acknowledge the Bible or the truth of it. Did God want to test the faithfulness of the people to "MY LAW" by ordering them to rest on...

This is just a ridiculous play on words. The Ten Commandments are written IN God's law and the ceremonial/sacrificial laws that were "shadows of things to come" are written IN the Mosaic Law. Happy?

Cain knew murder was wrong, Rachel knew stealing was wrong, Abraham knew lying was wrong, Joseph knew adultery was wrong, Satan knew coveting God's throne was wrong, people knew breaking the Sabbath commandment by gathering manna was wrong, all these were among the "voice, charge, commandments...

If you don't have God's law in your heart, you aren't a New Covenant Christian, because both Jeremiah 31:33 KJV and Hebrews 8:10 KJV say this very thing. LOL I have no choice but to reference the 4th commandment because the Mosaic Law is nailed to the Cross. How many times I gotta tell you the...

No, I rest on the Sabbath, according to the 4th commandment.

"arrange (rules or laws) into a systematic code" such as the Code of Hammurabi. Of course, the Ten Commandments existed before Sinai, and at Sinai were merely "arranged into a systematic code". It will always be wrong to violate any of them, thus proving the eternal nature of them. Everyone...

Seeing that the U.S. is the Second Beast of Revelation 13 which arose as the Papal First Beast was going down, saying the U.S. will be a part of the NWO is an understatement: the U.S. will be both the engine driving it and a war machine compelling membership to it.

What's ridiculous is you making the Bible say Christians establish the OC. Peace.

Sorry, I've no time to waste on those who refuse to acknowledge when they've painted themselves into a theological corner.

Fine, we can end the discussion, but let the record show you failed to explain the confusion that erupts in Romans 3:31 KJV by making "OC" = "law" and refused to ask how to resolve it.

"To him that knoweth to do good and doeth it not, to him it is sin". Are you arguing God will condemn those who sin ignorantly?