Search results

Okay, so why are PreMils following the "concept" of the Jewish religion, which is "of that spirit of antichrist"?

Actually, they do believe in "the 1000 years". They call it the "Messianic Age" (and of course, without Jesus). They fabricate it by their formula of the 6 days of creation X 1000 years equals 6000 years. And then adding in the 7th day sabbath X 1000, makes it to be 7 days = 7000 years. The...

The Jews are still looking for their messiah to come. According to their accounting of time, they see it as a few more years, and the messiah will come and usher in the 7th day of a 1000 year sabbath on earth. To some degree that is what PreMils follow also...

The Jewish fabled 1000 years will just be an extension of this current world of unsaved people, but on a remodeled (The Great Reset) planet. According to PM thinking, all that will be on the planet THEN, will be unsaved people, who were all unrepentant upon Jesus' Glorious return, "WHEN" (key...

Let's ask this question: Are the saints who suffered martyrdom during the Early Church age and the Mid-church age LESS WORTHY, than those who suffer martyrdom during the End Time church age? Your answer please.

Common sense and the limitations of our minds and bodies, informs us that the book of Revelation is a collection of separate visions given to John. It is apparent that ALL the visions were not given to him in one sitting, nor could he write them all in one sitting, with the limitations of their...

You are lacking some scriptural insight: Mat. 13:34-35 34. All these things spake Jesus unto the multitude in parables; and without a parable spake he not unto them: 35. That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, saying, I will open my mouth in parables; I will utter things...

Rev. 20:1-15 According to the "Progressive Amillennial view", the understanding is that "a thousand years" IS NOW, being symbolic of God's Grace through Christ, to ALL the world, ever since Pentecost. 20:1-3 A. "In chains of darkness"- Satan no longer has access to God's throne. He also no...

No. The story about Abraham's bosom is not factual. It's a parable, based on a semi-fictitious story, in order to deliver a single truth. What is the single truth that Jesus revealed in that parable?

Where do I ignore, change or deny God's written words? You do err, the minute you follow after the doctrines of "churchianity", concerning the book of Revelation, all of which is taught to them by their denominational endorsed Bible Colleges and Seminaries, aka the wisdom of men. You will not...

YES!! I KNOW!! I am one of those, who are "they". Ever since Pentecost, each born again Christian, in THEIR lifetime, is and has been reigning WITH Christ, who is WITHIN them NOW. We each are His ambassadors, for the preaching and teaching of the Gospel of God, Who is Christ Himself. What 1000...

No!! Jesus IS THE FIRST resurrection absolutely, AND if you ARE "a partaker of the divine nature"**, then you ARE having PART in the First resurrection, who ONLY IS Jesus. So, are you "risen with Christ"? You really do know, but "church-ianity" has corrupted the truth, and is leading many...

It's NOT A PRIVATE interpretation that these comments oppose "orthodox views", but rather are interpretations by the Lord's Spirit, and not by "the wisdom of men", and/or the traditions of men. 1 Cor. 2:5. I also have received similar, to almost identical interpretations from His Holy Spirit...

Lol...WRONG! Right from the beginning God the Father's deepest desire has always been that He would live within man, which He created out of earth. This planet is not even an option, if He couldn't. The planet earth is nothing to Him without us. If it weren't for Noah finding Grace in God's...

Saying it that way, I agree with you. I just wanted us to be clear that prior to Jesus' resurrection, being Himself the First resurrection, the Firstborn from the dead, there were no others that preceded Him into the kingdom heaven, such as many try to believe.

If you can think this through, WHICH earth did Jesus sacrifice His life for, even for the sake of the Father, of whom He had pity on because of His longsuffering over us. Now, thanks be to God the Father and God the Son who came from Heaven and became the sacrificial Lamb of God for the sins of...

My form of delivery is necessary, so that most here would know what it is that we are inheriting exactly. For me to use the words "inhabit" the new earth", does not define what the NEW Earth is. But, since I have made a clear distinction between "the New earth" being our Immortal flesh, as...

Yes, we are dancing around that one issue. But, the following extreme, for understanding, is what we all must agree to: Rom. 8 [9] But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if ANY MAN have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his. The...

I noticed that you purposely did not quote my last sentence** from post #638, so here it is again: "What did you think, that we being "partakers of the divine nature", is only an expression for our future immortaliy?? No, it's right NOW. "We HAVE this treasure [of God Himself] in earthen vessels...

Nope! You still are not seeing it. To be born again by His Holy Spirit, is not a sign around your neck saying that you are born again, just because you read His words. It's simply said in the following way: Rom. 8:8-9 [8] So then they that are in the flesh [only] cannot please God. [9] But ye...