Search results

Like I said, red herrings. The replacement theology is not found in Scripture, therefore your practical claim on the term is false and wrong. Ephesians 1:4 "According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:"...

Rom 11:28 (28) As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes. The unbelieving Jews are enemies of the gospel, and indeed of converted Jews and Gentiles. But as for the election of Israel, these are beloved for...

Rom 11:27 (27) For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins. The old Covenant with Israel is passed away, and we are living in the New Covenant period. We must ask ourselves honestly, how many Covenants did the Lord establish in prophecy that would take away the sins of...

Romans 1:16-18 "For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek. For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith. For...

Rom 11:26 (26) And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob: This blindness in part, or harness of Israel's heart will continue throughout the New Covenant period until the fullness of the Gentiles...

Rom 11:25 (25) For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. This has become one of the most controversial verses of scriptures...

Finally, you quoted verses in Romans 11. Congratulations! But you still MISUNDERSTOOD what God talked about. I will respond to each verse you quoted separately as permitted due to limited space. I will start with Romans 11:24 here: Rom 11:24 (24) For if thou wert cut out of the olive...

?? You do not make any sense here. Could it be because you are one with nature that cannot understand spiritual things, 1CO 2:13-14? Humm! According to what Scripture. So? Do you even study the firstfruits throughout Scripture? All believers in Christ are the firstfruits (salvation). It...

LIKE I SAID, prove it. You have not explained how the verses within Romans 11 destroy my position. Come on! Huh? I did not skip. It is because you have not yet explain what verses in Romans 11 you believe have destroyed my position. I am waiting. What verses? Show it to us. All you do...

Show us the Scripture where God said "Firstfruit Jews." So again, you do not know what you are talking about. It seems foolish to a natural man like you. Didn't you read the Scripture? 1Co 2:13-14 (13) Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the...

You are so wrong on many levels. The 144,000 is the spiritual number, not head count, representing ALL God's elect that John "HEARD". And then look around and saw the great multitudes of all same God Elect. God was talking about the same people, all of them from the Old Testament and the New...

How?? Explain this yourself. Prove it to see if your understanding of Romans 11 warrants it. Take your time. You do err, not knowing the Scripture. Replacement Theology is not a phrase that is in the Bible. It is a phrase conjured up by those opposed to the truth of God's very own words...

Did I say that? No. It will be on that self-same day the moment the trumpet shall sound, Christ returns and the rapture occurs. Yes that 7th trumpet being the "last trump".

No, where is Scripture proof of your nonsense? Rev 10:7 (7) But in the days of the voice of the seventh angel, when he shall begin to sound, the mystery of God should be finished, as he hath declared to his servants the prophets. Do you even understand what "the days of the voice of the...

I previously shared information regarding the 144,000 with supporting Scripture, but it seems that you did not receive it. This is not unexpected. Prove it. And you have not even refuted my position anyway. Pagan theologians?? LOL... based on what? Where is the proof?

This example demonstrates the act of speculating and interpreting without quoting scripture. Timtofly made a narrative based on his own private interpretation of the book of Revelation. He does not know what he is talking about.

Wrong. Who told you? Show us the Scripture where God has specifically told you how the trumpet sounds. One short blast? Long blast? Repeat blasting? Huh? Angel for days? Where do you read that in Scripture? Jos 6:4-5 (4) And seven priests shall bear before the ark seven trumpets of...

Obviously, you have no clues on the biblical doctrine of Amillennialism. Huh. You do not make any senses. You are really lost within the Book of Revelation.

Speculations. No Biblical Truth to this dispensational premillennialism nonsense. They get private interpretations from the world news and YouTube instead of the Word of God where His interpreation can be found. Beware of the false prophets.

What are you talking about? Please show the Scripture that says otherwise. Nothing to do with "church-ianity." I quoted verses exactly what God says. So you deny that the Old Testament Saints never born again? Well, its not an easy issue to understand to be sure, but what is clear is that...