Search results

Are you making a case in support of Westcott and Hort?

Read the rest of the quote. You selected only the part that suits you. - The result is a beautiful hybrid of the accuracy and reliability of a large-scale translation and the beauty and clarity of a literary paraphrase

I’m not talking about interpreting the language I’m talking about interpreting the meaning

Read what I posted from the NLTs own website. Number 694

A Biblical hysterectomy versus a Biblical abortion? I’ll have to do a search and see how many versions say anything about a miscarriage. Here is the ESV your go to translation. Num 5:21 - then’ (let the priest make the woman take the oath of the curse, and say to the woman) ‘the LORDmake you a...

Flawed example. God allowed the couple to have another child named Solomon. Are you one of those people who is going to tell me God is a baby killer because women and children died in the flood?

Paul said I knew a man who was taken to the third Heaven. The NLT says I was taken to the third Heaven. That’s not what Paul said. The NLT doesn’t just translate scripture. It interprets it .2Co 12:2 - I was caught up to the third Heaven fourteen years ago. Whether I was in my body or out of my...

So he kills unborn children? Were the firstborn in Egypt innocent? And saying God allowed Herod to kill children is like saying he allows all the murders, all the abortions, all the rapes, all the cancer, all the accidents, name it. Where would you have him step in?

Fathers not mothers and nothing about killing them . The NLT is nice to read but it is one of the worst and most inaccurate versions. It’s a paraphrase. If you want to make God out to be a baby killer that’s between you and God. As far as Exodus 20 there are generational curses but God doesn’t...

Now read mine. 2Ti 2:23 - Don't have anything to do with foolish and stupid arguments, because you know they produce quarrels

I too prefer Bibles written in modern English. I do understand that there is disagreement and why. You are left with having to choose which scholars you agree with, That’s why there are so many translations, I’ll leave you to argue with Davy over the perfect translation issue

Okay no problem I was just confused but I understand now

Again a personal attack and a mischaracterization of my position, I was King James Only for a very short time over 30 years ago, I soon saw the error of that movement, I could call you The Voice Only and that would be more accurate, I would be very careful in taking the position that God is in...

I don’t know as much as scholars but I know when. something is missing

Then why do you reject the KJV and why don’t the scholars agree with each other,

Giving someone something orally that causes a miscarriage is an abortion

I really don’t care who you believe.

You’re avoiding that it says it will cause a miscarriage. You said the Voice didn’t even indicate pregnancy. Num 5:21 YLT- (then the priest hath caused the woman to swear with an oath of execration, and the priest hath said to the woman) -- Jehovah doth give thee for an execration, and for a...

In your expert opinion what is the most accurate rendition of the Bible?

Just accepting what the scholars say without question is a better way to go? You’ll soon find they don’t agree with each other