Search results

Agree. Notice how my posts are being ignored in this thread. They are not even willing to consider whether or not the throne of Christ's judgment referenced in Matthew 25:31-46 is the same as His judgment seat, which it very clearly is. They are not willing to take into consideration the Old...

Doesn't matter. I was just clarifying what I was saying, which you misunderstood, as you so often do. It's such a waste of time talking to you. All you ever do is say that I'm missing or avoiding the point. There's an easy solution to this. I'm not going to waste my time trying to make any...

I know there is one God who exists as the Father, Son and Holy Spirit and am not saying otherwise. But, God the Father is differentiated from God the Son. And, in verses like Revelation 21:22, the Lord God Almighty is differentiated from the Son, so the Lord God Almighty refers to God the Father...

I agree that his view (the SDA view) of the thousand years is outrageous, but no moreso than yours. At least a fair amount of people agree with his view of the thousand years (unfortunately), but you're all alone with your beliefs.

Well, that was a given. Which is why I questioned whether you really want to go there. Only one of those three (Eusebius) didn't allow for the possibility that it was written by Peter and/or that it was legitimate scripture. After saying what you quoted him as saying there, Jerome later...

Of course we can. And you can drop it at any time without my permission. Great. Whatever. It's absolutely not. Of course, you are probably not understanding what I meant. I'm saying that preterism does not influence my personal beliefs in any way. Which is a fact. Okay, Dr. Pinseeker. LOL...

You just won't let this go. Nothing you said here is anything that you haven't already said multiple times and there is nothing here that we haven't already discussed. You may want to continue to repeat yourself, but I'm not interested in doing that. The only thing I'd be willing to do is...

I'm not, but you never know. Scare quotes? What does that mean? Why play games like this? Just be clear about what you're saying. Whatever. I know you like that word. I'm not bothered that you're bothered, just to be clear. Whatever. I'm not saying that about myself. Preterism has no...

You question if someone who sees Matthew 24:1-34 as all being fulfilled is a preterist or not? Really? How do you define a preterist then? Keep in mind that I'm not talking about full preterism here. He's a partial preterist. So, what I'm really asking is how would you define a partial...

What translation or paraphrase are you quoting there? Things that people do can be both evil and worthless at the same time. The Greek word there can mean either bad/evil or worthless, which is why most translations translated it as bad or evil because that fits the context of what Paul is...

I disagree. The judgment of Revelation 20:11-15 is the same as the judgment in Matthew 25:31-46 which is said to happen when Jesus returns. Why is the book of life opened in Revelation 20:12 if believers are not there? Both Matthew 25:41 and Revelation 20:15 refer to unbelievers being cast into...

He was talking to a select audience, but that doesn't mean he was saying only they would appear before the judgment seat of Christ. When you look at what he said carefully, you should see that he was talking about literally everyone that has ever existed and I showed why in post #2. Can you...

That statement means less than nothing to me coming from you, a person who foolishly denies the existence of Satan, demons and angels as created spirit beings who are separate from human beings. The gospel is concerned with people putting their faith in Christ so that they will be saved and...

I appreciate that you acknowledge that. I was very baffled as to how you were not seeing that. Mistakes happen. It's fine. Sort of, but I'm trying to get you to address my point. Since we agree that the "Lord God Almighty" refers to God the Father and that Revelation 11:17 refers to the "Lord...

What is the point you're intending to make here? I did not say there was only one temple building. I'm saying a retaining wall is not a temple building. The temple buildings referred to the buildings of the temple that each had four walls and were enclosed.

The only thing that I can think of that we could still discuss relating to this is the scope of the day of the Lord, which would have to include a discussion of 2 Peter 3:10-12. Do you want to go there?

I'm not saying that you're claiming that, but your questions 2 and 3 that you said were being debated implied that you thought you were debating against that claim even though no one is making that claim. Of course that would be true if they were not deceived into believing that it was not a...

So, is it your view that Satan and demons/devils were created at the same time that the angels were created, which you previously indicated was at some point during the six days of creation? If so, then I assume that would mean the reason that you can't see Satan as having been created very good...

Do I need to show a sampling of your posts displaying your bad manners or are you being purposely ironic here as some kind of joke?

Yep. Just dismiss my arguments without taking any time to address them. Since that's what you have decided to do, I'm now going to move on from this discussion. There's probably nothing we haven't covered at this point, anyway. I would highly recommend you spend more time studying 2 Peter...