Search results

1 Corinthians 15:42 So also is the resurrection of the dead. The body is sown in corruption, it is raised in incorruption. 43 It is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory. It is sown in weakness, it is raised in power. 44 It is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body. There is a...

No one says that God has a God. God exists as the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Here is God the Father speaking to God the Son... Hebrews 1:8 But to the Son He says: “Your throne, O God, is forever and ever; A scepter of righteousness is the scepter of Your kingdom. You continue to fail to...

It's not two groups. The least of these are a subset of the sheep. Jesus said "He who is not with me is against me" (Matthew 12:30). The sheep represent those who are with Jesus and belong to Him (see John 10) and the goats represent those who are against Him and do not have their names written...

It wasn't a rebuttal. Isn't it clear that I was saying that I don't know what you were intending to say? How can I give a rebuttal to something that made no sense? I'm trying to get you to be more clear in what you're intending to say. Are you just not able to do that? Are you saying that you...

What are you talking about? You speak nothing but gibberish. No one here ever has any idea of what you're talking about. What does this mean? Are you purposely trying to be as vague as possible? Do you not believe that the new covenant replaced the old covenant, as scripture teaches? Hebrews...

Amen. I don't think those verses are included in the Dispensatanist Bible.

Exactly. He's not the god of you or me or any believers.

What city and sanctuary are you referring to exactly? I feel sorry for you. I really do. You often make things far more complicated than they are. It's sad that you do that, but that's just you. Do you believe that the physical city of Jerusalem and the physical sanctuary were destroyed because...

That's clear as mud just like most of your beliefs. Without the blood of Christ of the new covenant, which replaced the inferior old covenant (Hebrews 8:6-7, Hebrews 10:9-10), no one from any time would be saved.

And what is your reason for believing that? And what point exactly do you think Jesus was trying to get across? There is no indication the the rich man and Lazarus were not real people. Why would he name Lazarus if he wasn't a real person? That makes no sense. Also, he mentioned Abraham and...

If the disciples asked three different questions then why are only two questions recorded in the Mark 13 and Luke 21 accounts? I personally see the question about the sign of His coming and the end of the age as one question. Do you not believe that His coming occurs at the end of the age?

But, somehow, you conclude that the Matthew 24 and Mark 13 accounts of the Olivet Discourse are all future. That's a major weakness in your view since you have no explanation whatsoever for why Matthew and Mark would have chosen not to record Jesus's answer to the disciples' first question.

There is nothing that I'm not factoring in. You should know by now that I've looked at this from every angle that you have. Do you actually not remember that we've already discussed this several times before? Apparently so, since you act like I haven't factored this in. What is the point of...

Who do you think are the people that destroy the city and the sanctuary and what is your understanding of the identity of the city and the sanctuary?

Old covenant starting up again? Impossible! Jesus made the old covenant obsolete forever when He established the everlasting new covenant with His shed blood. Hebrews 8:13 By calling this covenant “new,” he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and outdated will soon disappear...

You mean like how you ignore the clue given in Daniel 9:26 showing what the consummation resulting in desolation is about in verse 27? So, why don't you use Daniel 9:26 to interpret verse 27? Why don't you use NT verses to interpret Daniel 9:24 like many others, including myself, do? Instead...

Why not? There is no basis whatsoever for your claim. In each case, there is a description of an event that requires those in Judea to flee to the mountains followed some verses later by a description of the second coming of Christ. There is nothing explicit in Luke 21 telling us that there is a...

The religious leaders of Israel were proven to be wrong about a lot of things, including that. Why would you trust that they got that right when they were proven wrong about so many things? Paul taught that Gentiles are "fellow heirs" of God's promises (Ephesians 3:1-6), but you don't believe...

Of course it would, but where did I say that it would make sense for you to do that? Nowhere. I believe it's silly of you to not recognize that Daniel 9:26 is talking about the destruction of the physical city and sanctuary standing at the time He was cut off. You are completely missing the...

I say the same to you. It's just too bad that you believe so many things that aren't true. What exactly is your point here? Jesus said that He would draw all people to Himself (John 12:32). But, obviously, not all people believe in Him, so that means people can resist His drawing. People can...