Search results

Yet, Jesus has never been called the everlasting father. So, how do you square that?

Logic being valid is not limited to carnal minds of this world.

I meant a simple and general truth. There have been times in my life when I tried to help students understand the answer to a difficult math problem. While I too was a student, I got the answer correct and they either got it wrong or could not find any solution. There were times when they...

I already answered your question many times. An Appeal to Ignorance does not help your cause. In the Cultural Bible NSRV, it points out that common hyperbolic tropes now associated exclusively with Jesus were not the case in ancient times. For instance, ‘lord of lords and kings of kings’...

Another Strawman in the OP question is to falsely equate random claims to an authoritative reference. In any book, we might know what the characters say and even think. This is not authoritative. The narrative is what is authoritative. No where in the narrative of God’s word does the author...

Bye bye.

I already answered that, the child that IS. Born at the time of Isaiah’s writing 500BC. Just because this child is not named in Scripture does not mean it must be Jesus - who is also not named in Isaiah.

Subordinating your lesser understanding to one with great understanding is logical.

Nonsense! Nothing from the Spirit of God demands we abdicate logic. Nothing.

No! I will not respond further to what I already addressed! It is you who have decided to disengage by playing this game of doing laps on ground already covered. If you don’t answer my questions from post#506 unconditionally, we’re done.

Trinitarianism requires abdicating logic. Not a solid foundation to built doctrine. Converse. Scripture teaches Jesus is the son of God (not God the son). That’s good enough for me. Why is it not good enough for them? Why do they have to go beyond what Scripture teaches? And why do they have...

I deny any religious precept contrary to Scripture. That’s where it begins and ends. Nothing is Scripture states anything like God incarnated as a man. Of course, if you want to read into Scripture then anything goes. Let me ask you this; what Scripture verse says it is important to believe...

No one raises themselves from the dead, ‘mere’ or otherwise. Supposing so is a violation of the law of identity.

I don’t believe ‘born again’ means resurrected in a glorified body after death.

There are. More laps.

Ridiculous. How do you determine causal factors or do you just ASSUME they are all 100% liable with no allocation to non-human factors?

And you, refer back to post #506. Also, try answering the questions contained.

Yes, the child that is born at the time of Isaiah’s writings, ~500BC. He will be called those things, that Christ was not.

Word games. Anyone can irrationally debate anything. Normal debate is about things that are doubtful, compelling and contradictory evidence.

Stop being so self-centered. I was not talking about you but moral relativists and the philosophy, which is inherently contradictory.