Search results

Only out of love for Christ. Wives have additional burden to submit to their husbands as to the Lord.

Oy vey! What does AFAIK mean? Definitive. ? It’s my understanding to be a total and complete fake, in terms of not be authored by its pre-Noah namesake. At best, it is apocrypha. This begs the question of why you would rely on something other than Scripture? Yes, 100%. Words have meaning...

Equality is not an escape from responsibility.

No! This contradicts your previous statement of understanding legal contracts where explicit text supersedes ambiguous text. There is ambiguous text, yes but there is also explicit text. It’s just that the explicit text proves God is one, not 3 in 1 and is not Jesus. Ex 3:15. God’s eternal...

Terrible mothers are also terrible because of how they treat the kids father.

Both. You can post and it will make some people upset. Enoch is not Scripture, right?

I think God created Jesus. None of YHWH’s creations are YHWH. Of course I disagree with exclamatory statements. Just because someone exclaims the dropped toast is feces does not make it so. The Scripture truth is that God - in his unitarian nature- sent his son. Do you disagree with the...

You are confusing <what people say> with Scriptural truth. Others said Jesus was from Satan. Does that make it true?

Using you legal standard, one should not doctrinally invest in an ambiguous text when explicit verses are available, such as 20:31, right?

I do but feel free to use verses to enlighten me.

The new and creative ways to rationalize what is not in Scripture continue to amaze. No, the precise opposite. An all powerful God does not need to be strengthened by dead prophets.

Well said! Many trinitarians presume our rejecting the doctrine is because we lack understanding. The opposite is true. We reject the inherently contradictory and contrary to Scripture doctrine because we understand it is inherently contradictory and contrary to Scripture.

Jesus is no God at all since he said the Father is the only true God.

Yet, claiming these 3 compromise the nature of God is missing.

Such juxtaposition proves Jesus is NOT God. Who so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son? God, in his unitarian nature (as opposed to 'the Father,' which is a term trinitarians prefer).

People make this exclamatory statement all the time. Doesn't make the person they say it its actually God, the Creator of Jesus.

Now, I have to borrow money to donate to St. Jude with another reference to interfaith. o_O

I thought you were going to expand on the part in red. Hmmm. There still seems to be a disconnect. Perhaps your thesis statement needs to be flushed out. From what I gather, it's a bit of a stream of consciousness. What are you trying to say? From my understanding of the Old Covenant...

The rationalization to read into Scripture while simultaneously ignoring what Scripture explicitly teaches is A-M-A-Z-I-N-G. Jesus taught us how to worship God, to pray only to him, our Father, period.

You seem to do that to anyone who you disagree with. Is that common in Alabama?