Search results

Why did you not address what I said about Revelation 20:6 in my post? Can you tell me how those who are alive when Jesus returns will avoid the second death, keeping in mind that Revelation 20:6 says that the second death has no power over those who have part in the first resurrection? As for...

Jesus has not come yet. Where do you get that idea from that He already came? I mean, He obviously came once long ago, but Him coming like a thief in the night is talking about His return in the future.

You said "IMO your OP is taking two different subjects and combining them into one.". In my OP I quoted two passages in support of what I was saying, which are 1 Thessalonians 5:2-3 and 2 Peter 3:10-12. So, your comment came across as if you were claiming that those two passages refer to two...

I never said otherwise! Unbelievable...

What day are you talking about?

The Greek word translated as "quickly" there is "tachy" (Strong's G5035) and it means quickly or immediately. Without delay. Very fast. So, what do you think, that Jesus was saying He was coming immediately after the book of Revelation was written? Of course He was not. What He is saying when He...

Why are you turning "a cloud" (singular) into clouds (plural)? In Daniel 7:13-14, which refers to Jesus's ascension to heaven, the clouds of heaven represent angels. Daniel 7:13 “I was watching in the night visions, And behold, One like the Son of Man, Coming with the clouds of heaven! He came...

I am saying that 1 Thessalonians 5:2-3 and 2 Peter 3:10-12 are descriptions of the same event. I don't know how anyone can deny that. How can the day of the Lord that will come as a thief in the night be a different subject than the day of the Lord that will come as a thief in the night? How...

I can tell that you have never studied Romans 14:10-12 closely. Also, do you deny that the goats in Matthew 25:31-46 are unbelievers? They clearly are. It refers to Jesus sitting on His throne for judgment. How can that not be His judgment seat? Do you understand that Paul was referencing...

He referenced Isaiah! Hello? So, why shouldn't we take his Old Testament reference into account to help see the context of what Paul was talking about? You obviously have no clue about how to actually study scripture. Sad.

LOL. You are a child. You have no ability to debate whatsoever. Are you afraid to address what I've already said about this several times? Do you understand that Paul referenced Isaiah 45:22-24 in Romans 14:11? Is there something you don't understand about Isaiah 45:22-24 indicating that even...

They obviously are equal. Revelation 21:4 says there will be no more death at that point. Yet, you think there will be more death at that point. Your view blatantly contradicts Revelation 21:4. What do you think, that people will die during a supposed future thousand years and no one will mourn...

No, I was saying that most Premils argue against that because they know enough to not cause Isaiah 65:17-25 to contradict Revelation 21:1-4.

Yeah, he should have led with that so that we'd know why he created this thread.

Ask them yourself why they keep allowing people like you to post here.

Yes. The key word there being "after" and not "at the end of", as some try to say in their efforts to change the text. So, not only was He cut off after the 69th week ended, but He arrived after it ended, also. Good point. For people to say He was cut off at the end of the 69th week is just a...

You are blatantly twisting scripture to make it say what you want it to say. It specifically says that the Messiah would be cut off AFTER the 69th week, not at the end of it. Why are you so dishonest with scripture? Are you that desperate to believe what you want to believe, that you are even...

Yet, it clearly is about the new covenant, so you need to get your "facts" straight. Jesus established the new covenant with His shed blood and that made the old covenant animal sacrifices and offerings obsolete. That is what Daniel 9:27 is about. I can't think of a worse interpretation of any...

What is being rejected here repeatedly are your interpretations of OT prophecies and the words of Christ.

Futile effort? Hardly! You have done less than nothing to prove that anyone is born dead in their sins. All you do is take verse after verse out of context and then think you've proven something. It's a joke. No, that's exactly what I meant and I'm stating it accurately. Your claim that people...