Search results

You are taking Romans 14:10-12 completely out of context. Paul did not indicate that appearing before the judgment seat of Christ is something that anyone had yet done, but was only something that would happen in the future. He did not indicate at all that he himself had already appeared and was...

That's fine. I misunderstood because it came across that you were relating "I am coming quickly" directly to the phrase "the time is near". That gave the impression that you saw the words "quickly" and "near" as synonyms. But, that's not the case. Okay then. Let's move on. Yeah. These things...

LOL. Amillennialists obviously do not understand everything the same, so that is a silly comment, at best. You continue to not specifically address my arguments because you are apparently afraid to do so. Tell me when you appeared before the judgment seat of Christ, bowed before Him and gave an...

Do you know that the word "therefore" is not in that verse in most English translations? Also, the parallel verse of Mark 13:14 says "but when" instead of "therefore". So, how can we know what Jesus actually said? Did He say "When you therefore see the abomination of desolation..." or did He say...

No, it references the last person specifically focused on. The "prince to come" is not specifically focused on in Daniel 9:26. It's the people of the prince to come who are focused on there. They are the ones who would destroy the city and the sanctuary. The last individual focused on before...

Luke's account is not about a different even than the Matthew and Mark accounts. The reason that Luke worded it differently is because his audience was primarily Gentiles who would not have known anything about the prophecy in Daniel. So, it wouldn't make sense for him to reference the prophecy...

Jesus said the temple buildings would be destroyed and that is what spawned the Olivet Discourse. Daniel 9:26-27 talks about the destruction of the city and the sanctuary which occurred in 70 AD. So, it's obvious to anyone with discernment that Jesus was referring to Daniel 9:27 in Matthew 24:15...

You are extremely ignorant. What is your excuse for that? You deny that the old covenant is obsolete? Is the following verse in your Bible? Hebrews 8:13 By calling this covenant “new,” he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and outdated will soon disappear.

Are unbelievers referenced in the passage that Paul quotes in Romans 14:11 in relation to what he said in Romans 14:10-12? Answer this question if you want to be taken seriously, otherwise I have to conclude that you're just an non-serious person playing games. Romans 14:10 But why dost thou...

So, you are afraid to address what it says in the passage that Paul referenced in Romans 14:11 then (Isaiah 45:22-24)? Do you deny that unbelievers will bow before Christ to confess that He is Lord? Looks like context means nothing to you. You obviously just believe what you want to believe...

So, you think the six days of creation happened in eternity rather than in real time in literal days consisting of the day time and night time and evenings and mornings? You think there is night and day and evenings and mornings in eternity? No, there's not. You have no idea of what you're...

No one knows that. That refers to a 24 hour day, not an age. Is this all you have to support your belief? If so, then you have nothing as far as I'm concerned. You are the one who makes it irrelevant by making things up that aren't taught anywhere in scripture. Certainly, a verse referencing...

A vast majority of Premils believe that death will occur during the supposed future millennium, so you can't blame me for assuming that is what you believed as well. I thought you believed that Isaiah 65:17-25 refers to the time of the millennium and that you believed verse 20 indicates that...

LOL. Look at you butting in to every discussion I'm having with others like a little child. Pathetic. I don't need this nonsense from someone who thinks that the disciples wouldn't have any questions to ask Jesus after Him telling them that the temple buildings that they and the rest of the Jews...

There is nothing in all of scripture that references a seventh age. So, I can only assume you are just making that up. You mean what you think the Lord has put on your heart. I would obviously disagree that He put what you present on your heart. But, yes, let the readers decide who is right or...

He doesn't even know what the word "after" means, so there's no real hope in him understanding grammar.

Says the guy who misrepresented my beliefs multiple times in your previous post. You can dish it out, but you can't take it. Typical of you. Go ahead and react more, buddy. Let's see your true colors. Do you think it's Christ-like to misrepresent what I believe as you did multiple times in your...

So, you think the book of Revelation is "literal scripture". Amazing. You are just not someone that can be taken seriously.

Why would that be? Why would there be nothing about that time period anywhere in the New Testament except for Revelation 20? That makes no sense at all. The fact is that there are lots of scripture passages about that time period in the New Testament, but not as you understand it. Thanks for...

You are 100% incapable of refuting my interpretation, as you've already proven several times. So, you can say this all you want, but your words are meaningless. YAWN. Why are you resorting to lying? Do you think that helps your case? I have never said that "He was concerned for that temple of...