Search results

A title for the Anointed is not a name for YHWH.

@face2face, see? Just like I said. They claim mountains of support exist while ignoring the trinity is not in the Bible.

I don’t have to prove it. The burden is on you, who are making a positive claim. This is how logic, law and statistics work.

IDOLATRY.

No Scripture says this.

Conceding that God’s words can mean whatever you want them to mean.

What verse says this? Trinitarians do not recognize the contradiction of their doctrine. P1. God is a committee of 3. P2. One member of this committee is ‘fully’ God. C. 3 = 1

Well, the reason is because trinitarians abuse language, pervert montheism to mean 3in1. Therefore, unitarianism strikes a more precise contrast with trinitarianism.

You are deliberately confusing WHAT's with WHO's. Words are WHAT's. The chosen servant of God is a WHO.

With the possible exception of Luke, all the Biblical authors were unitarian Jews who reject the trinity to this day. So, you must interpret their writings from this monotheist perspective.

You are fully indoctrinated as it has been proven many different ways and many times. What constitutes proof for you and do you apply this very same standard to the anti-Biblical claim or do you merely accept 3=1 as a given?

This is what @Eternally Grateful does not get. There is no such thing as proof by assertion. Asserting a certain verse or chapter proves something does not make it so. In this way, they are misquoting Scripture, asserting it means something the author did not intend, out of context, etc. For...

What's funny is you cannot recognize the presumptions you make to "support" your doctrine.

What verse says that YHWH goes by a different, Earthly name?

The trinity* is not in the Bible. Only be reading what is not there does Scripture ‘prove’ the trinity, which is no proof at all. * What verse says something like The nature of God is a trinity - consisting of the Father, Son & Holy Spirit who are co-equal, co-substantial and co-eternal- and...

Can you be taught? See the ABC's and 123's of making it easy to understand why the trinity is wrong.

God's name. (Not Jesus but YHWH)

Invalid question, presumes a fact not in evidence. The text does not say that Adam saw God.

The "temple" referenced is figurative, NOT referring to Solomon's temple. For some reason, trinitarians suppose the rest of the sentence is literal.

Yet, your posts can. You just choose to belabor points, which is apparently the JW way. o_O