Search results

Yes, you are right. But the divide is too great for there to be any compromise anymore. The Democrats have unity at least among themselves and they are pulling out all the stops. The Republicans don't even have that. The Republicans had the numbers in the House and Senate and the...

No, I meant the people of the prince that shall come. (Dan. 9:26) Stranger

Interesting that the 'Mass', which is so important in the Roman Church, is inaccurately performed. No doubt it is another way to establish the difference between laity and priests. A difference which is straight out of hell. Appreciate your input. Stranger

Hey, why don't yall allow the saints (Christians) to partake of the wine and blood? Stranger

(Dan. 9:26) The people of the prince to come were the Romans. Which means he who is to come will be of the Roman empire. Stranger

It doesn't matter that the body of Christ doesn't have blood now. It is the same body, just without the blood. It bears the scars as proof. Christ's body died and was raised that others could be raised in like manner. But Christ's body did not die in corruption as other men are. Christ's...

The Gospel is believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved. Stranger

No, I don't know of any re-occurrence. Paul is clear in (1 Cor. 11:24-24) that as often as we do the Lord's Supper, it is in remembrance of Him. Stranger

For you to declare God is moral is to sit in judgement of God. As if your knowledge of morality is sufficient for such a feat. God is God. What He does is Holy, Righteous, and Good. The very establishment of Israel back into the land was accomplished by many who were not Christians. The...

I don't think length of time should be a reason not all the believers to partake of the wine. Yes, individual cups provide an answer for sanitary. Surely there is another reason for the priest being able to drink of the wine and blood, but not the saints. When was such an action taken and...

You're the one that was so concerned about Jesus walking through a wall. As if that proved His resurrected body was not the same body He had on earth. Again, Jesus was not sown in incorruption as all of mankind is. Yes, we shall be like Him as (1 John 3:2) says. Again, so what. Our...

Indeed. And when the wolf lies down with the lamb and the leopard the kid, I will acknowledge it. But that hasn't occurred yet. And to act as if it already has is being dishonest, or mistaken, or both. Stranger

No, just the ones that are anthropomorphisms fit my beliefs. Stranger

Better...or bitter....or truthful? To look at something as the animal kingdom representing peace, and spirituality, when it does not, is not being honest. To reject such a representation, is not being bitter...but honest. Stranger

Of course nature is harsh. It is brutal. It doesn't operate on 'fair'. To see the creation, as far as geography as having beauty is one thing. To look upon the animal kingdom as a beautiful picture of peaceful existence is a facade. Stranger

Then you should no better. See. Now everyone is an avid hunter and killer in nature, with pictures to prove it. Yet when you want to speak on the forum, all is sweet and rosey in nature, and everyone is a St. Francis of Assisi. I like the truth of the matter. Not the facade. Stranger

Of course it does. The world always ignores God. Stranger

Why? Stranger

Frank Lee How poetic. Yet the birds and critters that the hawks and raptors live on, don't see it the same. They are not so 'poetic'. Nature is 'dog eat dog'. It is not as you want to describe as skipping through the woods with the birds and bees and all is love and peace. That is just...

Because I am a born-again Christian, I am in a relationship with God and Christ. Thus whatever I do, be it good or bad comes under the scrutiny of God. And I am answerable to God for it. Jesus Christ is the Head of His body and the body functions accordingly. The word 'rule' does not seem...