Search results

@kcnalp I recommend raising the fact God is "Husband" to His People--he won't stick around!

Clearly, @Wrangler does not appear to receive correction--he's already been told many times his signature has an error (ie, it claims the whole Bible was written by Jews when it wasn't) and he refuses to correct it. This shows his attitude toward truth (including the arguments I brought against...

Obviously, I meant "What does 'not equal' mean in this context?" Anyone knows what "not equal" means outside of this context--something like "not the same"--I, again, was asking what you were trying to say in this context (because everything you've been saying here has been nonsense).

Guys (@Christophany @kcnalp @ByGraceThroughFaith @Enoch111 @Pearl @tigger 2 @GISMYS_7), lol I've been telling you this doctrine is his Achilles heel--he pretended to discuss it, now when questions are asked that he can't answer he's on the run. Whenever he brings this up in the future, just shut...

LOL Exactly. Shut you right up.

Go back and read.

So, again, you recognize your dilemma : "God relates to His People as 'Husband', and Jesus is clearly 'Husband' to God's People... but I am trying to say Jesus is not God... dangit, what can I say? Oh! The weak link is I can EMPTILY and BASELESSLY and WITHOUT PROOF and OUT OF THIN AIR merely...

1. No, I do not--you want to pretend that I'm being dishonest because it fluffs your little pillow. 2. You're saying God changed--changed His relationship to His People.

What does “not equal” mean? At this point, what we have is you emptily asserting God ceased relating to His People as Husband, despite : 1) No Scripture to back it up. 2) God doesn’t change. 3) James equates “friendship with the world” with “enmity with God” and “adultery” (they’re married to...

1. Humans have a God—He also submitted to baptism which seemed out of order. He was a human. 2. We aren’t told when the Revelation was given—could’ve been prior to His ascension. 3. Christ is God’s Son. A son is subservient to his father. Why do you have a problem with that?

Again, you’re here saying God ceases to relate to His People as “Husband”—God is the same yesterday today and forever though so what verse are you relying on to reject the reality that God is Husband to His People? James accuses his audience of being “adulterers and adulteresses” in connection...

It actually is—as stated some of the people passed seamlessly from Old to New (ie, the branches in Ro 11 which were never cut off).

I don’t believe you’ve actually proven that. It’s just an empty claim.

Lol That’s against His own Law. A son cannot have his father’s wife.

I’ve responded to those already. Which Scripture are you following that leads you to believe God is no longer Husband to His People?

What happened to my “ignorance”, etc, etc, etc, @BreadOfLife ? Is Jimmy also “ignorant”?

Well, like with Mormonism, at least the truth should get out so the rest of humanity which is capable of reason can laugh. Lol

Responses to Mr. Akin’s remarks provided in the YouTube comments section are apparently suppressed (looked for them on a friend's device, they did not appear--there aren't many comments, there's no other reason mine wouldn't appear), so I'll share them here : 1:16:09 Apples and oranges : Eve...

But this part you’re not : the fact that authoritative sources are left out proves IMO the Bible is incomplete.

Time stamp 1:14:14 of I will to keep things cool on my side and not alert Mods to the misbehavior of my interlocutors. After the discussion on the Church as New Eve I had here with @BreadOfLife @theefaith and @JamestheRabbit I called Catholic Apologist Jimmy Akin's Show on the topic... lo and...