Search results

Backtracking on what? I clarified what I meant, so what am I backtracking? You are deceptively trying to make it as if I meant something different than what I did. What is wrong with you?

If Ezekiel 38 is meant to be taken literally, then, yes, the evidence would be clear, but I'm not so sure that's the case. No one can point to any event in history where what is described there happened and it makes no sense to apply it to the future. That's why there's many different...

LOL. What compliment?

LOL. To be clear, I was referring to this statement you made: "There are many in this forum who think they understand, but when tested, fall short, and rarely admit it.". You are a good example of falling short when tested and not admitting it.

Yes, you are a good example of that.

So, is it your belief that Ezekiel 38-39 is referring to all the nations from around the world as well? You said before that the same nations referenced in Ezekiel 38-39 are the nations referenced in Revelation 20:7-9. Now, you're saying the nations in Revelation 20:7-9 include "the former...

OSAS is "Once Saved Always Saved", so NOSAS is "Not Once Saved Always Saved". It's a major debate topic on soteriological forums, but Davidpt likes to debate it on this eschatological forum as often as he possibly can for some reason.

This is so incredibly stupid. Of course, according to his Calvinist perspective, OSAS and Amil go hand in hand and NOSAS and Amil don't, but he also understands that not all Amils interpret Revelation 20:6 the same way that he does. It's not a requirement to interpret the verse exactly as he...

LOL. Only per NO ONE but you can OSAS and NOSAS both be biblical.

You are not even thinking here. Do you believe that you are blessed and holy right now because of what Jesus did for you? I do. I believe that is true of all believers right now. But, what if someone loses their faith? Is that still true of them after that? Do you believe that the second death...

You make some of the most contradictory, ridiculous arguments that anyone has ever made. How are you defining OSAS and NOSAS? They can't both be true based on how everyone but you defines those. The term OSAS (Once Saved Always Saved) means that when someone becomes saved they can't lose their...

Of course that's his motive. He gets entertainment from that. He is just here to play games. He is the only Premil in the world who tries to make the argument that it's not possible to believe NOSAS and also be an Amil. Of course it's possible, depending on how someone interprets the text. It's...

No, it is not! And you are noticeably making ZERO effort to actually address what I said. Very easily. And what does this have to do with anything I said about Luke 20:34-36? Nothing! If we already have eternal life now then why does scripture speak in terms of inheriting eternal life in the...

But, that isn't what the reference to "Gog, and Magog" refers to in Revelation 20:8. It refers to "nations" (Greek: ethnos) that number "as the sand of the sea" from "the four quarters of the earth" (all around the world).

He doesn't speak through you, that's for sure. The Holy Spirit would never deny the future bodily return of Christ as you do.

Can you confirm for all to see that you do not believe that Jesus Christ will return physically and bodily from heaven in the future? Once you do that, I won't say any more about it.

I don't call spiritual things foolishness, which is how you are deceptively trying to portray this. I explicitly stated what I believe is foolish about what you have said. I am calling your denial of a future bodily second coming of Jesus Christ foolishness. Don't foolishly equate yourself with...

The "nations" referenced in Revelation 20:8-9, which are symbolically represented as "Gog, and Magog", number "as the sand of the sea". Do you think the nations of Ezekiel 38-39 number as the sand of the sea? Revelation 20:7 And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of...

Says the Premil guy who pits Zechariah 14 against NT scripture like Matthew 24:35-39, 1 Thessalonians 5:2-3, Thessalonians 1:7-9 and 2 Peter 3:10-12.

I, of course, don't deny that we are spiritually in the kingdom of God now and that we worship God now in spirit and in truth and so on, but that isn't what Jesus was talking about in Luke 20:34-36. Jesus talked about being worthy to attain the age to come and the resurrection of the dead. He...