Search results

It would appear that you are never thinking through what you are saying. Ever. Every post of yours is complete foolishness. He will be physically destroying all living unbelievers when He comes. That is clearly taught in other passages as well like 1 Thessalonians 5:2-3 and 2 Peter 3:10-12...

More foolishness from you, as usual. You have no spiritual discernment whatsoever. Literally none. To deny His bodily second coming is heresy! You need to repent of your hyper-spiritualization of physical realities! Acts 1:9 Now when He had spoken these things, while they watched, He was taken...

Based on your interpretation of Ezekiel 28:12-19, you apparently think a cherub is a man. Is that what you're going to go with? Or are you going to go with the idea that the cherub of Ezekiel 28:12-19 is an imaginary figure? Make up your mind. What exactly do you think a cherub is, if not an...

False. Matthew 24:29 “Immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken. 30 Then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven, and then all the tribes...

So, is your argument that Ezekiel 28:12-19, which describes an anointed cherub who was created perfect in all his ways and protects the holy mountain of God, does not describe an actual living human or angel king of Tyre, but instead describes an aspect of the glory of God? How could an aspect...

And your view is that the battle will end when Christ returns, right? Revelation 19:11-21 clearly portrays the future return of Christ from heaven when He will take vengeance on all unbelievers, as other scriptures like 2 Thessalonians 1:7-9 describe.

Were Adam and Eve on the earth for 1,000 years in the presence of Jesus in all His glory before rebelling? Obviously not. So, that isn't a valid comparison.

Okay, thanks for clarifying what you meant. I wasn't sure what you were saying and that's why I said I'm not sure what you mean. I figured you might not have been saying that you thought I believe that it was fulfilled. Here's something to consider. We're talking about Christ's kingdom, right...

Historical? Not sure what you mean. I'm not saying that Revelation 11:15 is fulfilled. I'm saying that it will be fulfilled when Jesus returns at the seventh and last trumpet at which point He will then deliver His kingdom that He has been reigning over since His resurrection to God the Father...

Agree 100%. The text itself says that the angel takes hold of the dragon who is identified as Satan. It doesn't say that the angel literally takes hold of Satan himself. Premils miss this. The text gives a symbolic picture of a dragon being chained up in a prison, not of Satan himself being...

Exactly! Their hearts would clearly already be in rebellion against Christ before Satan is loosed and gathers them to oppose "the camp of the saints". Or do Premills think that those Satanists worship and follow Christ for 1,000 years, but then Satan is able to somehow immediately change their...

Another thing to point out about Isaiah 2:1-4 is that it relates to "the last days". In the New Testament, we see scriptures that relate the last days to the time period between the first and second coming of Christ, not to a time period following the second coming of Christ. In Acts 2:16-21...

LOL! Yet another foolish statement by a Premill that misrepresents Amill. One of MANY. Amil never says that rebellion doesn't occur during the thousand years. Premills are the ones who claim that, not Amills. Oh, really? So, why does Premills relate Zechariah 14:16-21 to the millennium then...

Revelation 11:15 refers to the time when Jesus will deliver the kingdom He has been reigning over since His resurrection to the Father. Revelation 11:15 The seventh angel sounded his trumpet, and there were loud voices in heaven, which said: “The kingdom of the world has become the kingdom of...

Great post that I'm sure Premils will not understand at all, if they even bother to read it. It's always all or nothing with them. The idea of scripture referring to people groups like the Jews and Gentiles in a general sense is not a concept that Premils understand. So, to them, Satan can only...

He says "obviously" that not all fallen angels are in the bottomless pit while providing ZERO evidence to back that up. He obviously has no idea of what the word obviously means. He thinks just claiming that something is true without any evidence to back it up makes it true. It's ridiculous.

The question I have for you is why you turn simple things into convoluted things? In 1 Corinthians 15:22-23 Paul clearly refers to a one time event that will happen at the second coming of Christ, not an ongoing event that happens for each person one at a time. All of the dead in Christ will be...

Sure, why not? Why would only some fallen angels be in the bottomless pit? Do you think the following only applies to some, but not all fallen angels? Jude 6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness...

Here we go again with this stupid nonsense. You do understand that you're the only one who makes this dumb argument, right? There's a reason for that. Everyone else knows it's not a legitimate argument. But, you insist on continuing to make a fool of yourself with this nonsensical, childish...

Congratulations on acknowledging that He is presently reigning. Many Premils don't even understand that, which is very sad to witness. When do you think 1 Corinthians 15:28 is fulfilled in relation to the second coming of Christ? I assume 1,000+ years later? What is the basis for thinking that...