Search results

(Jer. 30:11) "For I am with thee, saith the LORD, to save thee: though I make a full end of all nations whiter I have scattered thee, ye will I not make a full end of thee:..." (Jer. 31:10) "Hear the word of the LORD, O ye nations, and declare it in the isles afar off, and say, He that...

No matter what city the Baptists dwell in they are called Baptists. Many times they are the 'First Baptist Church of Dallas' or any other city. But still Baptists. The Church of Rome has no other designation than the Church of Rome, or Romanists. They wrongfully took the designation...

What's offensive is the way the Church of Rome has hijacked the term 'Catholic' and applied it to themselves. They are not Catholic. They are the Church of Rome which is nothing but a part of the greater Catholic Church of which I and every other born-again believer belongs to. Stranger

I did answer your question. Go back and reread. You're the one that complained of not being able to see yet are using the same font. I have not ignored you nor am afraid of your comments and questions. Stranger

Our relational assent was accomplished in the plan of salvation and when we came into it when we were born-again. We have the Holy Spirit. We are now the sons of God. Our lives are hid with Christ in God. Stranger

And? Stranger

It is always possible to find some fellowship among believers on a forum. But it will always be 'some'. This is why it is so important to have a local church you attend. That is the place where you will experience a complete fellowship. The forums cannot take the place of that. I'm sure...

If they belong to the Roman Church in New York they should be called Romanists. Like wise in Walla Walla. If they belong to a Baptist Church in New York, they should be called Baptists. Like wise in Walla Walla. Both Baptists and Romanist Christians can call themselves Catholic as both...

The Church Fathers were just men. How could Peter be so wrong so many times? Because he was just a man, prone to sin and error. Thus we have the Bible to insure our way. Don't waste your time with links unless you use them as credit to what you have written. If you just give me a link...

Romanist is not a derogatory term. Just means you belong to the Church in Rome. It doesn't matter to me if you respond or not. But if you do, you need to clean up your posts. Stranger

You say 'once we come to know'. Still sounds like intellectual assent. What you're saying is the more we know, or once we know so much, then we can't sin in Heaven. But we know enough now to believe and be born-again. And we won't be learning anything new that will secure us in Heaven...

The Jews that are in the land now are of the Jews who were scattered all over the north and other countries. (Jeremiah 23:7-8) "Therefore, behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that they shall no more say, The LORD liveth, which brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt; But...

Welcome, and I agree, God has taken care of this. He has created a salvation that secures us in Heaven forever. And He has done it by placing us in Christ forever. And whenever it was you came to Christ, you were placed in Christ at that time. (Col. 3:3) "For ye are dead, and your life is...

I agree. And my confidence in never falling away from Heaven will be based on what Christ has done and His keeping power. It will never be based on my ability to not sin. We will forever be 'in Christ'. Thus forever be with Him in Heaven. And, we have that same assurance now, for when you...

So you're saying intellectual ascent and understanding will protect us from falling in Heaven? Well, we as believers have that now. Since all arguments are decided at Calvary, then we cannot lose our salvation here either. Stranger

epostle1 What is it with you Romanists? You are the masters of deception, twisting, and misleading. Your post is riddled with your comments and mine made to look as though they belonged to the other. Do yall have classes you go to that teach this? Do you really think anyone is fooled by...

I did show you, go back and reread. And I have shown you in Scripture where Peter being called a rock does not mean the Church is built on Peter. And I have shown you one of your own Romanists, Hans Kung, agrees with me. Peter had no primacy. Never claimed any primacy. Was never shown...

They are of God and promised by God. Stranger

What stupid statements you make. Where did I say I didn't believe in Christ? Go back and reread. Stranger

I didn't say Jesus did not exist then. I said, Abraham did not believe on Jesus Christ as his Lord and Saviour. Abraham believed God concerning the promise for him to have a son. In other words he did not believe what is called the New Testament Gospel. Melchesidec was not Jesus Christ...