Search results

Please point out in specifics what part of my writing is "judgmental religious slurs"? The biblical tribulation is never to be repeated, but the holocaust does not fit Scripture so is not the tribulation. It was tragic and horrifying, but does not fit all the prophesies of the final...

I recognize both the good and condemnation of the law. I accept teh law as Paul said, it was a school master till we reached the age (salvation by faith through grace). It kept Israel till faith should come. Now that faith is here we are no longer under the law for righteousness. We are now...

Well missing verses, especially in light of older texts are controversial. I do not buy into conspiracies until I see evidence of a conspiracy. I do not see vaticanus and sinaiticus as some vast conspiracy to destroy the supremacy of all the doctrines we believe in.

Don't need to. If you have a different view- lets hear it.

I would disagree. I tell people that if they want the full impact of Scripture and grow to their fullest measure, they need to get into the Hebrew and Greek. Most English translations do not corrupt doctrine and one can be a true disciple with using many English translations, but it is a...

Well if you bother to read history, you will find Titus laid siege in 66 AD, left for a time and then returned and the legions sacked and destroyed the temple. that is fact. Satan is already the god of this world. when Jesus returns, He would never give His throne up, except to the Father as...

Spiritual rest means we ceasde form trying to work for salvation as the law required and rest in the finished work of Jesus at the cross.

Thats funny, I knew of the Mosaic laws and how many, long before I even owned a computer, never mind google. Well teh ten instone which minister death are part and parcel of the 613. and they were given to Israel as a people alone. And ot teh gentile who chose to live in the land of Israel.

Well as I do not do google for bible study, that is irrelavent to me. I have read Ex. 20 sans google for 49 years. I read it in context and know that those ten commandments written in stone are a ministry of death as Paul said in corinthians.

and this is a perfect example of either a paraphrase or dynamic translation. these I tell people to avoid for they are full of opinion and translators thoughts on how a verse should be read instead of it being written and read as it was originally. As we draw closer to teh end, we can expect...

Believers spirits and souls go to heaven, but our bodies go to ground. The good that gains eternal life is trust in the death and resurrection of Jesus for our sin payment. No matter how much good one does, their sin debtr has to be accounted for. they either trust Jesus, or pay the debt...

what is it you are trying to say in this?

The sad reality is this: As long as people will hold to covenant theology with its allegorical method of hermeneutics, there will always be those who twist the commands God gave to the Jews and seek to make them apply to the church as well. Of the 613 commands God gave to Moses on the mount...

No they are whole true words. Teh ten commandments were given to Israel as a nation alone! they are part of the entire Mosaic Law. Man made the sections (moral, civil, ceremonial) there is no command for the church to keep the Sabbath. That is only derived by people allegorizing the...

Have read Josephus. Yawn! He is not Scripture Never said that the Roman prince destroyed the sanctuary. I only described the prince as a Roman ruler Yes Messiah=christ but prince does not =king. Titus is not the ruler Daniel prophesied about. Daniel spoke of a future ruler who would be a...

If they truly are detractions. We have no direct or even direct evidence these were intentional omissions, just beliefs and opinions. As I said, with or without those debated verses, the bible suffers no ill on any doctrine.

Sorry but your KJV only version, all others are perversions just doesn't hold water. I love and use use the KJV, have done so for over 40 years now. But there are many excellent translations as well as many lousy translations. The only infallible inerrant Scripture are the original autographs...

Well your subtle insult is not so subtle. I am convinced it is Scripture, just like you are convinced you have Scripture. Time will show who holds the correct understanding.

No that is the rules of universal grammar! Remember it is God who created language, grammar and its rules so we can understand when people speak and write. Jesus is now King of Kings no longer a Prince. He is not the prince who came and destroyed the sanctuary. Every rule of understanding...

Well my translation of choice is the KJV. I am not too concerned with other "literal" translations, my concern is the greater danger from the dynamic translations and paraphrases. While mnay of the omissions show crucial doctrines, all can be thouroughly defended even if those verses are not...